Marketing Automation
Providers using this tag (139)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 32 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 43 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (27)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (7)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Marketing Automation” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 135 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Marketing Automation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 67.5 | 26.5 | +41 | 135 |
| Operational Transparency | 45 | 13.7 | +31.3 | 135 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 53.8 | 23.2 | +30.6 | 135 |
| Contract Quality | 41.8 | 17.6 | +24.2 | 135 |
| Discoverability | 69.5 | 58.1 | +11.4 | 135 |
| Contract Governance | 15.7 | 6.3 | +9.4 | 135 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 40% | 14% | +26 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 38% | 12% | +26 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 45% | 11% | +34 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 22% | 14% | +8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 HubSpot 91.6
- 2 Customer.io 83.8
- 3 Brevo 81.7
- 4 Mailchimp 79.2
- 5 Kit 78.5
- 6 Zoho CRM 78.1
- 7 ActiveCampaign 77.6
- 8 Salesforce Marketing Cloud 77.3
- 9 OneSignal 76.3
- 10 Stannp 76.1
- 1 OneSignal 75.4
- 2 MoEngage 67.8
- 3 Unbounce 65.6
- 4 Bloomreach 63.7
- 5 Boom Ai 63.6
- 6 Loops 62.9
- 7 Cordial 62.9
- 8 Kit 60.4
- 9 Customer.io 59.9
- 10 Knak 58.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.