Customer Data Platform
Providers using this tag (54)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (7)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Customer Data Platform” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 50 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Customer Data Platform, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 43.3 | 14 | +29.3 | 50 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 51.3 | 23.4 | +27.9 | 50 |
| Access Clarity | 54.2 | 26.5 | +27.7 | 50 |
| Contract Quality | 45.9 | 20.1 | +25.8 | 50 |
| Contract Governance | 16.8 | 6.5 | +10.3 | 50 |
| Discoverability | 70.9 | 61 | +9.9 | 50 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 38% | 10% | +28 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 42% | 13% | +29 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 34% | 11% | +23 |
| Security | 94% | 96% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 21% | 13% | +8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Customer.io 89.3
- 2 Boom Ai 79.9
- 3 RudderStack 76.2
- 4 Treasure Data 74.6
- 5 MoEngage 71.7
- 6 SAP Emarsys 71
- 7 Ortto 70.5
- 8 Blueshift 70
- 9 Bloomreach 68.6
- 10 Immutable 68.4
- 1 MoEngage 67.8
- 2 Boom Ai 65.8
- 3 Bloomreach 63.7
- 4 Cordial 62.9
- 5 Customer.io 62.1
- 6 Immutable 58.9
- 7 RudderStack 57.2
- 8 Bluecore 54.1
- 9 Chord 53.6
- 10 Insider 51.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.