established · 1.5 market domain

Customer Data

Score 27.1 / 100 33 providers +11 via APIs 17 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Customer Relationship Management 1

Providers using this tag (33)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 15 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Unrated 1 Not yet scored

APIs with this tag (17)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (11)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Customer Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Aaron's ActionIQ Adobe Bird Gladly Inspectorio Localytics Microsoft Dynamics 365 Southern California Edison Southern Company Talon.One

Score breakdown

Frequency
46.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.9
spread across providers
Quality lift
66.8
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
12.4
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Marketing Automation 18 co-occurrences CDP 7 co-occurrences Segmentation 7 co-occurrences Push Notifications 8 co-occurrences Email Marketing 9 co-occurrences Customer Data Platform 6 co-occurrences Audiences 6 co-occurrences Personalization 8 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Api tag17
Provider tag33
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag4

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 31 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Customer Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
31
of 33 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
55.6
+32.7 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
36.4
+24.5 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
28.9–83.8
median 52.9 · σ 13
How the 31 split by band
Exemplar 7Strong 7Developing 15Thin 2Emerging 0Minimal 0
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 58.9 23.2 +35.7 31
Contract Quality 50.4 17.6 +32.8 31
Access Clarity 59 26.5 +32.5 31
Operational Transparency 44.8 13.7 +31.1 31
Discoverability 73.9 58.1 +15.8 31
Contract Governance 17.8 6.3 +11.5 31

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 44% 14% +30
MCP server (first-party) 38% 12% +26
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 44% 11% +33
Security 97% 98% -1
Arazzo workflows 0% 2% -2
Governance rules 22% 14% +8

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Customer.io 83.8
  2. 2 Optimizely 80.8
  3. 3 Listrak 73.7
  4. 4 Klaviyo 73.6
  5. 5 Adobe Campaign 72
  6. 6 Mapp Marketing Cloud 70.4
  7. 7 Encharge 67.2
  8. 8 Acoustic 64.7
  9. 9 Inflection.io 64.6
  10. 10 Zaius 60.8
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Optimizely 62.5
  2. 2 Customer.io 59.9
  3. 3 Klaviyo 54.4
  4. 4 Acoustic 53
  5. 5 WoowUp 52.9
  6. 6 Mapp Marketing Cloud 49.8
  7. 7 Inflection.io 49.3
  8. 8 Planhat 45.7
  9. 9 Monetate 45.5
  10. 10 Emotive 42.1
All 33 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 31 carry a score (94%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 23 of 31 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/customer-data"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/customer-data"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/customer-data/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.