Sales
Providers using this tag (179)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 11 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 32 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 40 Limited public surface area
Emerging 41 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 25 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (82)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 20 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (54)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Sales” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 54 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Pipedrive Marketplace (CRM integrations from third-party publishers for the SMB sales CRM) | 24% |
| Commerce and CRM | 20% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 171 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Sales, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 46.8 | 23.9 | +22.9 | 171 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.5 | 13 | +13.5 | 171 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 34.9 | 23.2 | +11.7 | 171 |
| Contract Quality | 26.3 | 17.2 | +9.1 | 171 |
| Discoverability | 64.4 | 57.9 | +6.5 | 171 |
| Contract Governance | 10.3 | 6.5 | +3.8 | 171 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 34% | 13% | +21 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 34% | 12% | +22 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 36% | 11% | +25 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 16% | -2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 HubSpot 93.2
- 2 Salesforce 88.8
- 3 Zoho CRM 84.4
- 4 Brevo 80.8
- 5 Outreach 79.3
- 6 Clarify 72.5
- 7 Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales 70.8
- 8 Unify 70.1
- 9 Act! CRM 70
- 10 Lightfield 69.4
- 1 Lightfield 67.4
- 2 Relm 62.6
- 3 Monaco 61.4
- 4 Unify 60.5
- 5 Clay 60.5
- 6 Instantly 60.5
- 7 Entergram 60.4
- 8 Caretta 60.3
- 9 Poggio Labs 58.6
- 10 Fixture 58.3
Coverage caveat. 141 of 171 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.