B2B
B2Bb2b
Providers using this tag (234)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 21 Limited public surface area
Emerging 54 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 91 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 8 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (63)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (35)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “B2B” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 211 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged B2B, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 29.1 | 26.5 | +2.6 | 211 |
| Operational Transparency | 16.2 | 14 | +2.2 | 211 |
| Contract Quality | 21.4 | 19.8 | +1.6 | 211 |
| Contract Governance | 7.5 | 6.4 | +1.1 | 211 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 23.8 | 23.4 | +0.4 | 211 |
| Discoverability | 60.8 | 61.2 | -0.4 | 211 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 10% | +6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 13% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 11% | +7 |
| Security | 96% | 97% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Kinde 86
- 2 ZoomInfo 84.7
- 3 Commerce Layer 70.8
- 4 Mirakl 70.7
- 5 6sense 70.6
- 6 Orange Business 70.1
- 7 Lusha 69.8
- 8 Swell 66.9
- 9 Unify 66.9
- 10 Seamless.AI 66.2
- 1 Lusha 63.1
- 2 Unify 60
- 3 Mirakl 56.3
- 4 6sense 55.6
- 5 Seamless.AI 55.3
- 6 ZoomInfo 54.7
- 7 Business Software and Services Reviews | G2 54.5
- 8 G2 54.1
- 9 toksta 53.3
- 10 2X 49.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.