Procurement
Providers using this tag (225)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 34 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 33 Limited public surface area
Emerging 85 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 69 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (85)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 41 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 19 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (22)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Procurement” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
225 providers carry this tag directly, and 249 counting the 13 narrower tags below — 24 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 218 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Procurement, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 28.2 | 26.5 | +1.7 | 218 |
| Contract Governance | 6.2 | 6.3 | -0.1 | 218 |
| Discoverability | 57.3 | 58.1 | -0.8 | 218 |
| Operational Transparency | 11.4 | 13.7 | -2.3 | 218 |
| Contract Quality | 15.1 | 17.6 | -2.5 | 218 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 17.3 | 23.2 | -5.9 | 218 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 14% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 12% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Tradeshift 64.7
- 2 Ottimate 59.9
- 3 General Services Administration 58
- 4 Malt 55.8
- 5 Stotles 54.1
- 6 Proactis 54
- 7 Coupa 53.5
- 8 Starbridge 53.4
- 9 Avnet 53.3
- 10 Agiloft 51.7
- 1 OpenGov 63.1
- 2 Starbridge 62.9
- 3 Stotles 57.7
- 4 Sybilion 56.7
- 5 Tradeshift 50.9
- 6 Govly 49.7
- 7 Matchory 49.3
- 8 Arkestro 45.1
- 9 Apicbase 44.6
- 10 NationGraph 44.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.