Accounts Payable
Providers using this tag (70)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (20)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (8)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Accounts Payable” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
70 providers carry this tag directly, and 77 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 7 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 69 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Accounts Payable, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 37.4 | 26.5 | +10.9 | 69 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.3 | 13.7 | +5.6 | 69 |
| Discoverability | 62 | 58.1 | +3.9 | 69 |
| Contract Quality | 21.2 | 17.6 | +3.6 | 69 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.6 | 23.2 | +2.4 | 69 |
| Contract Governance | 8.3 | 6.3 | +2 | 69 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 14% | 0 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 12% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 22% | 11% | +11 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Tradeshift 64.7
- 2 Float Financial 59.9
- 3 Ottimate 59.9
- 4 Vic.ai 58.6
- 5 Weel 54.2
- 6 Proactis 54
- 7 PayMate 53.9
- 8 Campfire 52.2
- 9 Rillet 49.6
- 10 OpenEnvoy 48.1
- 1 Campfire 55.5
- 2 Candis 51.3
- 3 Tradeshift 50.9
- 4 Rillet 50.8
- 5 Mesh Payments 44.6
- 6 Ramp 39
- 7 Light 35.2
- 8 Consola Finance 34.9
- 9 Ottimate 34.6
- 10 Vic.ai 32.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.