Expense Management
Variants seen in the corpus:
Expense Managementexpense-management
Providers using this tag (81)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 23 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (12)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Float Public APIREST API (OpenAPI 3.1.0, 71 operations across 47 paths) for automating accounting and reporting against Flo...Weel Open APIThe Weel Open API is a single RESTful interface that programmatically reads and writes a business's spend d...Airwallex Issuing APIThe Airwallex Issuing API enables businesses to create and manage virtual and physical corporate cards for ...
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Zoho ExpenseThe Zoho Expense API allows you to manage expenses, expense reports, receipts, trips, and users programmati...Ola Corporate APIThe Ola Corporate API enables large enterprises to automate employee and expense management on the Ola Corp...Ekuaibao Open APIThe 合思开放平台 (Ekuaibao / HOSE Open Platform) REST API. 200+ documented operations across contacts, corporatio...Spendesk Public APIREST API for managing corporate cards, expense claims, vendor invoices, wallet summaries, settlements, bank...
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Expensify Integration Server APIREST-style API for exporting expense reports, creating and updating policies, managing employees, and integ...American Express @ Work B2B APIThe American Express @ Work B2B API is a suite of services that allows businesses to securely access their ...DiDi Enterprise (DDES) Open APIDiDi Enterprise Services (DDES) Open API for corporate employee travel management — approval, bills, budget...
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Frequency
53.6
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
2.2
spread across providers
Quality lift
36.3
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Corporate Cards 35 co-occurrences
Spend Management 35 co-occurrences
Reimbursement 13 co-occurrences
Corporate Travel 11 co-occurrences
Business Travel 9 co-occurrences
Accounts Payable 14 co-occurrences
Travel Management 8 co-occurrences
Expenses 10 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag76
Api tag12
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 81 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Expense Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
81
all scored
Mean Kin Score
30.2
+9.5 vs catalog 20.7
Mean Agent Readiness
14.2
+4.5 vs catalog 9.7
Spread
1.5–63.7
median 27.6 · σ 18.1
How the 81 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 9Developing 23Thin 11Emerging 23Minimal 15
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 37.3 | 22.3 | +15 | 81 |
| Contract Quality | 26.9 | 17.5 | +9.4 | 81 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.4 | 17.9 | +7.5 | 81 |
| Discoverability | 67.7 | 60.4 | +7.3 | 81 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.4 | 11.3 | +7.1 | 81 |
| Contract Governance | 10 | 6.4 | +3.6 | 81 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 28% | 16% | +12 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 7% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 9% | +10 |
| Security | 99% | 88% | +11 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 13% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 Slash 63.7
- 2 Astrada 63.4
- 3 Float Financial 61.8
- 4 Soldo Software and Services 61.8
- 5 Mamo 57.1
- 6 Dext 56
- 7 Weel 55.7
- 8 Airwallex 55.6
- 9 Engine 54.5
- 10 Duplo 53.7
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Slash 47.2
- 2 MileIQ 39.8
- 3 Mesh Payments 39.4
- 4 Astrada 36.9
- 5 SAP 35.8
- 6 Light 35.2
- 7 Pliant 34.4
- 8 Perk 32.8
- 9 Float Financial 32.6
- 10 Soldo 30.8
All 81 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in
the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of
25 August 2026, across 26891
providers, using the same computation served by the
APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of
5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/expense-management"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/expense-management"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/expense-management/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.