Expense Management
Providers using this tag (78)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 23 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (11)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Expense Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
78 providers carry this tag directly, and 83 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 5 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 77 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Expense Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 39.6 | 26.5 | +13.1 | 77 |
| Contract Quality | 25.2 | 17.6 | +7.6 | 77 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.3 | 13.7 | +6.6 | 77 |
| Discoverability | 63.1 | 58.1 | +5 | 77 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 27.7 | 23.2 | +4.5 | 77 |
| Contract Governance | 8.2 | 6.3 | +1.9 | 77 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 21% | 14% | +7 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 21% | 12% | +9 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 14% | 0 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Soldo Software and Services 61.8
- 2 Cledara 61.5
- 3 Slash 61
- 4 Float Financial 59.9
- 5 Astrada 54.7
- 6 Mavenlink 54.6
- 7 Soldo 54.3
- 8 Weel 54.2
- 9 Mamo 53.8
- 10 Engine 53
- 1 Mavenlink 61.3
- 2 Pleo 52.9
- 3 Cledara 50
- 4 Slash 47.6
- 5 Mesh Payments 44.6
- 6 Ramp 39
- 7 MileIQ 37.3
- 8 Light 35.2
- 9 Gett 33.7
- 10 Soldo Software and Services 33.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.