Supply Chain
Providers using this tag (637)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 69 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 86 Limited public surface area
Emerging 209 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 251 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (98)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 27 Limited public surface area
Emerging 40 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (34)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Supply Chain” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
637 providers carry this tag directly, and 1566 counting the 11 narrower tags below and the 33 beneath them — 929 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Procurement and B2B Buying (source-to-pay suites, spend management) | 31% |
| Maritime Logistics (ocean shipping, eBL, ports) | 30% |
| Shipping and Logistics | 28% |
| Consumer Goods (product data and retail supply chain) | 24% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 591 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Supply Chain, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 58.3 | 57.9 | +0.4 | 591 |
| Contract Governance | 5.9 | 6.5 | -0.6 | 591 |
| Contract Quality | 15.5 | 17.2 | -1.7 | 591 |
| Access Clarity | 22.1 | 23.9 | -1.8 | 591 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.7 | 13 | -3.3 | 591 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.3 | 23.2 | -4.9 | 591 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 13% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 12% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 11% | -1 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 16% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Tradeshift 64.8
- 2 Avetta 62.3
- 3 Optoro 61.9
- 4 LeafLink 61.5
- 5 Dun & Bradstreet 60.7
- 6 Rose Rocket 60.5
- 7 Katana 60.4
- 8 MVMNT 60.1
- 9 SPS Commerce 59.8
- 10 Crunchtime 59.6
- 1 Amberai 60.8
- 2 Walmart 57.3
- 3 Optilogic 55.6
- 4 Kargo 50.9
- 5 Matchory 49.3
- 6 Loadsmart 49.2
- 7 Tradeshift 49.1
- 8 Happyrobot 48.4
- 9 Freight Waves 48.1
- 10 Canix 47.4
Coverage caveat. 549 of 591 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.