Supply Chain
Providers using this tag (621)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 76 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 90 Limited public surface area
Emerging 192 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 246 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 3 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (96)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 28 Limited public surface area
Emerging 35 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (35)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Supply Chain” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
621 providers carry this tag directly, and 1487 counting the 11 narrower tags below and the 32 beneath them — 866 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 576 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Supply Chain, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 58.4 | 58.1 | +0.3 | 576 |
| Contract Governance | 6 | 6.3 | -0.3 | 576 |
| Contract Quality | 15.5 | 17.6 | -2.1 | 576 |
| Access Clarity | 23.9 | 26.5 | -2.6 | 576 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.3 | 13.7 | -3.4 | 576 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.6 | 23.2 | -4.6 | 576 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 14% | -6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 7% | 12% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Infor 68.1
- 2 Dun & Bradstreet 65.9
- 3 Tradeshift 64.7
- 4 Optoro 61.8
- 5 LeafLink 61
- 6 Walmart 60.9
- 7 Rose Rocket 60.5
- 8 Katana 60.4
- 9 MVMNT 59.9
- 10 Augment 58.9
- 1 Walmart 58.5
- 2 Optilogic 54.9
- 3 Loadsmart 51
- 4 Tradeshift 50.9
- 5 Matchory 49.3
- 6 Happyrobot 49
- 7 Freight Waves 48.7
- 8 Canix 46.2
- 9 RELEX Solutions 45.5
- 10 First Resonance 45.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.