EXIGER

Exiger is an AI-native supply chain, third-party, and software supply chain risk and compliance company. Its 1Exiger platform unifies supplier, product, part, component, and risk data into a single system to help organizations map and orchestrate compliant, resilient physical and software supply chains. Product areas span supply chain visibility and optimization, trade and third-party risk and compliance, due diligence intelligence (DDIQ), and software supply chain security (SBOM analysis, from its Ion Channel acquisition). Exiger serves government and commercial customers and is FedRAMP authorized. This profile was surfaced as an Insight Partners portfolio company and enriched from Exiger's public corporate, trust, and legal surfaces; Exiger does not publish a public developer portal, API reference, or client SDKs.

EXIGER is profiled on the APIs.io network. Tagged areas include Company, Supply Chain, Risk Management, Third-Party Risk Management, and Compliance.

EXIGER’s developer surface includes engineering blog, support, and 6 more developer resources.

🌐 Visit website 📡 Profile data on GitHub

13.9/100 emerging ▬ flat Agent 0/100 human only Front door AI 2/6 trace Heartbeat 100/100 alive saas Full breakdown ↓
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0 · Show this score on your site →

0 APIs

Company Supply Chain Risk Management Third-Party Risk Management Compliance Due Diligence Software Supply Chain SBOM Governance Risk and Compliance Artificial Intelligence

Kin Score

Kin Score How this is scored →
scored 2026-11-06 · rubric v0.27.0

Composite quality — 13.9/100 · emerging

Contract Quality 0.0 / 21

Developer Ergonomics 1.2 / 17

Access Clarity 6.3 / 17

Operational Transparency 0.0 / 11

Contract Governance 0.0 / 10

Discoverability 4.1 / 9

Regulatory Posture 2.6 / 15

Agent readiness — 0/100 · human only

Machine-Readable Contract 0 / 18

Agentic Access Contract 0 / 10

Documented Reversibility 0 / 6

MCP Server 0 / 12

Machine-Readable Auth 0 / 10

Idempotency 0 / 9

Stable Error Semantics 0 / 8

Request/Response Examples 0 / 7

Rate-Limit Signaling 0 / 7

Typed Event Surface 0 / 6

Agent Skills 0 / 5

Well-Known Catalog 0 / 4

Consent & Bot Identity 0 / 3

A2A Agent Card 0 / 8

Dry-Run / Simulate Mode 0 / 4

Delegated User Identity 0 / 6

Protected Resource Metadata 0 / 5

Registration Without a Human 0 / 6

Agentic Commerce Well-Known Document 0 / 5

Pagination 5 / 5

Distinct Operations 3 / 3

MCP Tool Quality 6 / 6

Regulatory Posture applies to this provider. Its tags matched the Horizontal (data, software, accessibility, platform) regime, so Regulatory Posture carries 15 points of the composite. If this regime is wrong for your business, say so on your provider repo — the applicability map is public and we will correct it.

Create-or-Update Ergonomics could not be measured. We hold no machine-readable contract for this provider to read, so there is nothing to measure a write surface against. Excluded rather than scored zero: never-measured and measured-empty are different facts. Publishing an OpenAPI is what makes this facet — and several others — scorable at all.

The six quality facets above are damped to 85 points between them, because the conditional facet above carries the other 15. That is why each facet's contribution is shown against a damped maximum: raising a quality facet moves the composite by 85% of its nominal weight, not 100%. The full arithmetic is at apis.io/rating/.

Show this score on your site.

It updates itself when the score changes. Paste this where you link to your API docs:

<a href="https://apis.io/providers/exiger/"><img src="https://apis.io/badge/exiger/card.svg" alt="EXIGER on APIs.io — Kin Score by API Evangelist"></a>

Other styles, a README pill and a shields.io endpoint are on the badge page.

Raise your score.

Agent readiness — checks not met, largest first (exact, from this profile):

Machine-Readable Contract +18 pts — api_specs includes an OpenAPI document
MCP Server +12 pts — deployment.mode + probe verdict on the mcp/ manifest, not the pointer; an unprobed slug falls back to authorship
Agentic Access Contract +10 pts — agentic_access artifact present (x-agentic-access), graded by author
Machine-Readable Auth +10 pts — a served openid-configuration/oauth-authorization-server carrying `issuer` (served), else the securitySchemes class in the provider OpenAPIs — bound (mutualTLS, DPoP, Signature) > negotiable (oauth2 authorizationCode/clientCredentials, openIdConnect) > bearer (http bearer, apiKey)
Idempotency +9 pts — OpenAPI mutating operations declare an idempotency key — a header, a request-body property, or a named de-duplication token whose own description says so (verified); else common[].type matches /idempoten/i (documented)
Stable Error Semantics +8 pts — OpenAPI $refs a shared error schema across 4xx/5xx responses (verified), else common[].type includes ErrorCatalog / ErrorCodes / DeclineCodes

13 more unmet checks in the Agent Readiness table above.

Kin Score — facets with the most composite points still available (weight × headroom):

Contract Quality scores 0.0 — up to +25.0 composite points
Developer Ergonomics scores 7.1 — up to +18.6 composite points
Operational Transparency scores 0.0 — up to +13.0 composite points

Each check links to what satisfies it. Publish the artifact, or tell us where it already lives, and the score moves on the next scoring run.

Improve this rating by publishing the missing artifacts — every area above can be raised, and the full rubric is at apis.io/rating/. Every facet and dimension name above is a link: it opens that measurement's own page — what it means, the exact checks that feed it, how the whole catalog distributes on it, and the providers at the top of it. This rating is computed from the provider profile at artifacts.apis.io/exiger/apis.yml: open an issue on github.com/api-evangelist/exiger to ask a question or point us at an artifact you publish. Submit an artifact on GitHub — free → Manage your own listing — the Influence plan, $499/mo →

Markets this provider is in provisional

The Kin Score Market layer reads a provider inside its market: its position, and how deep its integrations go. Depth is only comparable within a position. Provisional and unweighted: not part of the Kin Score or agent readiness.

Market	Position	Depth	Registered MCP server	Declares compatibility
Cloud Security Attestation and Secure-by-Design	standard	17.2 (thin)	-	-

Registered MCP server and declares compatibility are report only — not weighted. Undeclared means we found nothing we can read, so there is no number: we never infer integrations.

Security Posture 2

Authentication, domain security, vulnerability disclosure, and trust-center signals.

Exiger Domain Security

TLSv1.3 · HSTS · DMARC

SECURITY

Exiger Trust Center

SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, NIST CSF, CMMC, FedRAMP

SECURITY

Resources

Access & Security 3

Authentication, authorization, and security posture

TrustCenter

TrustCenter

Compliance

Compliance

DomainSecurity

DomainSecurity

Operate 1

Status, limits, changes, and where to get help

Support

Support

Commercial 2

Pricing, plans, and the legal terms of use

PrivacyPolicy

PrivacyPolicy

TermsOfService

TermsOfService

Company 2

The organization behind the API

Website

Website

Blog

Blog

Source (apis.yml)

aid: exiger
deliveryModel:
  model: saas
  open_source: false
  commercial: true
  callable_host: false
  label: Hosted service · you call their endpoint
  confidence: medium
  source:
  - pricing
  generated: '2026-08-28'
  method: derived
accessModel:
  pricing: unknown
  onboarding: unknown
  trial: false
  try_now: false
  public: false
  label: Unknown
  confidence: low
  source:
  - security
  generated: '2026-11-06'
  method: derived
image: https://kinlane-images.s3.amazonaws.com/shared/apis-json/icons/exiger.png
name: EXIGER
description: Exiger is an AI-native supply chain, third-party, and software supply chain risk and compliance company. Its
  1Exiger platform unifies supplier, product, part, component, and risk data into a single system to help organizations map
  and orchestrate compliant, resilient physical and software supply chains. Product areas span supply chain visibility and
  optimization, trade and third-party risk and compliance, due diligence intelligence (DDIQ), and software supply chain security
  (SBOM analysis, from its Ion Channel acquisition). Exiger serves government and commercial customers and is FedRAMP authorized.
  This profile was surfaced as an Insight Partners portfolio company and enriched from Exiger's public corporate, trust, and
  legal surfaces; Exiger does not publish a public developer portal, API reference, or client SDKs.
url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/api-evangelist/exiger/refs/heads/main/apis.yml
x-type: company
x-source: vc-portfolio
x-backed-by:
- insight-partners
x-tier: stub
x-tier-reason: portfolio-lead
specificationVersion: '0.23'
created: '2026-07-17'
modified: '2026-07-19'
tags:
- Company
- Supply Chain
- Risk Management
- Third-Party Risk Management
- Compliance
- Due Diligence
- Software Supply Chain
- SBOM
- Governance Risk and Compliance
- Artificial Intelligence
tags_raw:
- Company
- Supply Chain
- Risk Management
- Third-Party Risk
- Compliance
- Due Diligence
- Software Supply Chain
- SBOM
- Governance, Risk, and Compliance
- Artificial Intelligence
apis: []
maintainers:
- FN: Kin Lane
  email: kin@apievangelist.com
- FN: APIs.json
  email: info@apis.io
common:
- type: Website
  url: https://www.exiger.com/
- type: Blog
  url: https://www.exiger.com/perspectives/
- type: Support
  url: https://www.exiger.com/contact/
- type: PrivacyPolicy
  url: https://www.exiger.com/privacy-and-legal-center/#privacy-notice
- type: TermsOfService
  url: https://www.exiger.com/privacy-and-legal-center/#terms-conditions
- type: TrustCenter
  url: https://trustcenter.exiger.com/
- type: Compliance
  url: https://trustcenter.exiger.com/
- type: DomainSecurity
  url: security/exiger-domain-security.yml
x-enrichment:
  date: '2026-07-19'
  status: backfilled
  pass: local-v1
  note: backfilled from .gitignore signal + verified work evidence

Work with this as data

Every provider here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for providers

9 MCP tools reach this

find_providersBrowse and filter every provider in the catalog.
get_provider_artifactsEvery artifact this provider publishes, grouped by type.
get_provider_operationsEvery operation across all of their OpenAPIs — one call instead of parsing every spec.
get_provider_toolsEvery MCP tool they ship, with the operation each wraps.
get_provider_evidenceHow each part of their score was established. Free — the basis for a claim should not sit behind it.
get_provider_ratingPRO — composite, band, trend and facet scores.
apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.

All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page

This provider

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/exiger"

All providers

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers?limit=25"

Every operation they expose

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/exiger/operations?limit=25"

How their score was established

curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/providers/exiger/evidence"

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

GitHub Google LinkedIn

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.