Risk Management
Risk Managementrisk-management
Providers using this tag (163)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 57 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 53 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (39)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 163 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Risk Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.4 | +2.3 | 163 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 20.1 | 17.9 | +2.2 | 163 |
| Access Clarity | 23.7 | 22.3 | +1.4 | 163 |
| Discoverability | 61.5 | 60.4 | +1.1 | 163 |
| Contract Quality | 18.3 | 17.5 | +0.8 | 163 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.3 | 11.3 | -1 | 163 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 16% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 7% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 9% | +5 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 13% | +4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 IBM 62.6
- 2 Moody's 57.8
- 3 Microsoft Active Directory 54.3
- 4 SailPoint 52.8
- 5 Origami Risk 52.4
- 6 Transmit Security 51.3
- 7 VISO Trust 49.1
- 8 Gauntlet 48.7
- 9 TrustLayer 48.5
- 10 Google Cloud Security Command Center 48.1
- 1 American Express Global Business Travel 42.6
- 2 IBM 39.4
- 3 Moody's 36.5
- 4 Tribe Payments 35.7
- 5 TrustLayer 34.3
- 6 SAP Ariba 33.9
- 7 CyberSource 33.1
- 8 Matchory 33.1
- 9 Mastercard 32.4
- 10 SailPoint 32.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/risk-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/risk-management"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/risk-management/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.