Risk Management
RiskRisk Management
Providers using this tag (264)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 13 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 43 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 39 Limited public surface area
Emerging 86 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 79 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (117)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 33 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 31 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (58)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Risk Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 58 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
264 providers carry this tag directly, and 295 counting the 3 narrower tags below — 31 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 251 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Risk Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discoverability | 61.4 | 58.1 | +3.3 | 251 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.6 | 23.2 | +2.4 | 251 |
| Access Clarity | 28.4 | 26.5 | +1.9 | 251 |
| Contract Governance | 7.8 | 6.3 | +1.5 | 251 |
| Operational Transparency | 14.2 | 13.7 | +0.5 | 251 |
| Contract Quality | 17.2 | 17.6 | -0.4 | 251 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 14% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 OneTrust 72.7
- 2 Drata 70.2
- 3 Dun & Bradstreet 65.9
- 4 AlphaLoops FMCSA Carrier Data API 64.9
- 5 anecdotes 64
- 6 Tomorrow.io 63.8
- 7 Fenergo 62.3
- 8 Transmit Security 59.9
- 9 Secureframe 57.1
- 10 Experian 57
- 1 OneTrust 55.9
- 2 Mireye 51.4
- 3 Justt 50.2
- 4 Matchory 49.3
- 5 Drata 48.6
- 6 Fenergo 46.5
- 7 Transmit Security 45.1
- 8 MedTrainer 43.7
- 9 Dun & Bradstreet 42.3
- 10 Secureframe 41.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.