Risk Management
Providers using this tag (168)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 29 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 62 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 52 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (42)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (13)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Risk Management” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 162 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Risk Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Governance | 8.5 | 6.4 | +2.1 | 162 |
| Discoverability | 62.1 | 61.2 | +0.9 | 162 |
| Access Clarity | 26 | 26.5 | -0.5 | 162 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 21.5 | 23.4 | -1.9 | 162 |
| Operational Transparency | 12 | 14 | -2 | 162 |
| Contract Quality | 16.1 | 19.8 | -3.7 | 162 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 8% | 10% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 10% | 13% | -3 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 10% | 14% | -4 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 OneTrust 68.2
- 2 Drata 65.4
- 3 MedTrainer 60.1
- 4 Aclaimant 54.2
- 5 Experian 53.5
- 6 Origami Risk 52.8
- 7 RegScale 50.9
- 8 Transmit Security 50.9
- 9 TrustLayer 50.4
- 10 Coalition 50.2
- 1 OneTrust 51.6
- 2 Drata 48.6
- 3 Nucleus Security 41.7
- 4 Experian 39.4
- 5 1Token 36.5
- 6 Vanta 33.8
- 7 MedTrainer 33.1
- 8 Matchory 33.1
- 9 UrbanFox 31.8
- 10 ADVANCE.AI 31.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.