established · -1.3 market domain

AML

Score 25.3 / 100 88 providers +12 via APIs 35 APIs Search apis.io →
Workflows using this tag
Anchorage Digital - Receive a crypto deposit · Anchorage Digital Anchorage Digital - Trade via RFQ · Anchorage Digital
Business capabilities this tag reaches
Financial Crime Management 1 Compliance Management 1 Real Estate Compliance & Regulatory Management 1
Variants seen in the corpus: Anti-Money LaunderingAML

Providers using this tag (88)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (35)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
World-Check One APIWorkflow-based REST/JSON API for screening entities against the World-Check risk intelligence database. Sup...53.3Authologic AML APIThe Authologic AML API enables Anti-Money Laundering screening combined with identity verification in a sin...52.9Anchorage Digital AML APIAnti-Money Laundering compliance endpoints52.1SEON AML APIThe AML API from SEON — 1 operation(s) for aml.50.9VaultRE Aml APIOperations related to AML checks50.9Cognito Identity Verification APIREST API for identity verification, KYC, and AML watchlist/PEP screening. JSON:API media type (application/...49.6Strise Connect APIGraphQL API for programmatic access to core Strise functionality — search companies and persons, screen for...49.4Sumsub APISumsub's REST API provides programmatic access to a full-stack verification platform spanning identity veri...46.6Digio AML/CFT APIDigiShield - Anti-Money-Laundering and Counter-Financing-of-Terrorism screening and ongoing monitoring agai...46.5Transaction Screening APIThe SWIFT Transaction Screening API enables financial institutions to submit transactions to the SWIFT Tran...45.8Securitize Connect API (Securitize iD)OAuth-based identity API that lets partners add "Log in with Securitize iD" to their own application and, w...44.6Salv Aml APIThis section contains all operations managing the state of persons and transactions. There are three endpoi...44.2Chainalysis KYT APIEnterprise REST API for real-time anti-money-laundering monitoring of crypto transactions - register deposi...42.3Quadrata Passport APIServer-side REST API for Quadrata Passport: login/access-token authentication, ECDSA-signed privacy data re...39.7
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (12)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “AML” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Anchorage Digital Bynn Intelligence Digio EVEDEX Fireblocks Mastercard Moody's Refinitiv Eikon SEON SWIFT Thomson Reuters VaultRE

Score breakdown

Frequency
53.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.1
spread across providers
Quality lift
36.0
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
29.5
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Compliance broader

Related tags

KYC 62 co-occurrences Financial Crime 23 co-occurrences Transaction Monitoring 19 co-occurrences Sanctions Screening 21 co-occurrences Identity Verification 41 co-occurrences KYB 21 co-occurrences RegTech 21 co-occurrences Document Verification 14 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag88
Api tag35
Openapi tag6
Openapi op tag17

Markets provisional

Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 85 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged AML, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
85
of 88 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
36.6
+12.5 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
21.9
+7.8 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
1.8–71.9
median 35.9 · σ 18
How the 85 split by band
Exemplar 6Strong 8Developing 24Thin 18Emerging 22Minimal 7
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 41.2 24.5 +16.7 85
Contract Quality 31.6 18.6 +13 85
Operational Transparency 25.5 13.2 +12.3 85
Discoverability 68.1 59.1 +9 85
Access Clarity 37.8 30 +7.8 85
Contract Governance 16 9.7 +6.3 85

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 20% 18% +2
MCP server (first-party) 21% 16% +5
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 21% 13% +8
Security 100% 99% +1
Arazzo workflows 5% 1% +4
Governance rules 56% 36% +20

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Didit 71.9
  2. 2 OpenSanctions 71.2
  3. 3 Trulioo 71.1
  4. 4 Solidus Labs 67.9
  5. 5 ComplyAdvantage 67.3
  6. 6 iDenfy 66.8
  7. 7 CipherOwl 65.4
  8. 8 Fenergo 65
  9. 9 Dotfile 60.1
  10. 10 Lukka 58.8
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Didit 71.2
  2. 2 Topograph 57.3
  3. 3 Lukka 56
  4. 4 Trulioo 51.9
  5. 5 ComplyAdvantage 49.1
  6. 6 Authologic 48.4
  7. 7 Resistant AI 47.1
  8. 8 Landmark Information Group 47
  9. 9 Strise 45.5
  10. 10 Fenergo 44
All 88 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 85 carry a score (97%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 77 of 85 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/aml"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.