Identity Verification
Identity VerificationIdentity verification
Providers using this tag (155)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 29 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 51 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 28 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 19 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (80)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 29 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 29 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (23)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Identity Verification” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 151 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Identity Verification, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 40.5 | 19.8 | +20.7 | 151 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.9 | 23.4 | +18.5 | 151 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.7 | 13.9 | +14.8 | 151 |
| Access Clarity | 37.7 | 26.5 | +11.2 | 151 |
| Discoverability | 69.8 | 61.2 | +8.6 | 151 |
| Contract Governance | 8.6 | 6.4 | +2.2 | 151 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 10% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 13% | +2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 27% | 11% | +16 |
| Security | 100% | 96% | +4 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Infobip 75.4
- 2 MethodFi 71.4
- 3 8x8 70.3
- 4 Sift 66.4
- 5 iDenfy 66.2
- 6 Method Financial 65.9
- 7 Strivacity 65.7
- 8 Swisscom 64.9
- 9 JuriSign 63.1
- 10 KPN 62.4
- 1 Didit 58.4
- 2 Clearspeed 58.1
- 3 Topograph 55.2
- 4 KarmaCheck 55.1
- 5 SoFi Technologies 50.9
- 6 Infobip 48.7
- 7 Nokia Network as Code 46.9
- 8 Swisscom 45.9
- 9 Resistant AI 45.9
- 10 Offendersearch API 45.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.