Identity Verification
Providers using this tag (152)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 20 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 57 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 28 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 17 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (61)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (21)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Identity Verification” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 149 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Identity Verification, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 36.5 | 17.6 | +18.9 | 149 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.6 | 23.2 | +18.4 | 149 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.8 | 13.7 | +14.1 | 149 |
| Access Clarity | 37.6 | 26.5 | +11.1 | 149 |
| Discoverability | 67.4 | 58.1 | +9.3 | 149 |
| Contract Governance | 8.7 | 6.3 | +2.4 | 149 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 14% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 12% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 26% | 11% | +15 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Infobip 82.4
- 2 Strivacity 67.9
- 3 Method Financial 67.3
- 4 Trustly Group 65.4
- 5 8x8 65.3
- 6 JuriSign 65.3
- 7 Socure 63.6
- 8 Truora 63.1
- 9 iDenfy 62.7
- 10 Didit 62
- 1 Infobip 63
- 2 Didit 59.8
- 3 Clearspeed 58.1
- 4 Topograph 56.7
- 5 KarmaCheck 55.1
- 6 Trulioo 53.9
- 7 SoFi Technologies 52.6
- 8 Authologic 49
- 9 Checkr 46.3
- 10 Trustly Group 46
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.