Network APIs
Network APINetwork APIs
Providers using this tag (41)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (8)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 1 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Network APIs” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 41 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Network APIs, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 49.8 | 23.2 | +26.6 | 41 |
| Contract Quality | 37.4 | 17.6 | +19.8 | 41 |
| Operational Transparency | 30.9 | 13.7 | +17.2 | 41 |
| Discoverability | 65.6 | 58.1 | +7.5 | 41 |
| Contract Governance | 12.8 | 6.3 | +6.5 | 41 |
| Access Clarity | 31.1 | 26.5 | +4.6 | 41 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 14% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 12% | 12% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 49% | 11% | +38 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 14% | -7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Infobip 82.4
- 2 Orange Business 64.9
- 3 KPN 61.9
- 4 Swisscom 59.1
- 5 Verizon 57.3
- 6 América Móvil 55.8
- 7 GSMA 53.8
- 8 Plumma 53.4
- 9 MTN Group 51.6
- 10 MEF 51.4
- 1 Infobip 63
- 2 Swisscom 45.9
- 3 Telia Company 44.8
- 4 ETSI 43.7
- 5 SK Telecom 43.7
- 6 Orange Business 43.5
- 7 GSMA 40.8
- 8 3GPP 40.4
- 9 KORE Wireless 38.2
- 10 KPN 36.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.