SIM Swap
Providers using this tag (27)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (18)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 27 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged SIM Swap, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.8 | 17.9 | +25.9 | 27 |
| Contract Quality | 37.9 | 17.5 | +20.4 | 27 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.3 | 11.3 | +17 | 27 |
| Discoverability | 74.7 | 60.4 | +14.3 | 27 |
| Contract Governance | 17.9 | 6.4 | +11.5 | 27 |
| Access Clarity | 33.1 | 22.3 | +10.8 | 27 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 48% | 16% | +32 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 7% | +8 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 48% | 9% | +39 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 13% | -6 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Infobip 71
- 2 Nokia Network as Code 65.7
- 3 KPN 61.9
- 4 GSMA 59.8
- 5 América Móvil 59.6
- 6 Reliance Jio 58.4
- 7 TELUS 55.7
- 8 Bharti Airtel 53.9
- 9 MTN Group 53.7
- 10 Syniverse 52.3
- 1 Infobip 47.7
- 2 SK Telecom 43.7
- 3 Nokia Network as Code 43
- 4 GSMA 42.2
- 5 KPN 40.8
- 6 GSMA Open Gateway 39.5
- 7 AT&T 37.3
- 8 Syniverse 35.8
- 9 MTN Group 35.7
- 10 TMT ID 34
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/sim-swap"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/sim-swap"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/sim-swap/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.