niche · -1.7 market industry

CAMARA

Score 19.8 / 100 37 providers +1 via APIs 32 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (37)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (32)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 2 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
SingVerify Device Location APIVerifies whether a mobile device is within an expected area or country at the time of a login or transactio...20.9SingVerify Device Roaming APIReports whether a subscriber's device is currently roaming outside Singapore, used as a risk signal in frau...20.9SingVerify Number Verify APINetwork-based verification that the mobile number a user declares is the number of the SIM the request is a...20.9SingVerify SIM Swap APIReal-time signal indicating whether the SIM bound to a mobile number has been changed recently, so that a r...20.9Match (CAMARA)CAMARA-aligned identity-match API that compares user-supplied attributes (name, address, date of birth) aga...13.3Number Recycling (CAMARA)Tells callers whether a mobile number has been recycled (re-assigned to a new subscriber) since a given dat...13.3Number Verification 1.0 (CAMARA)Earlier CAMARA Number Verification implementation, still maintained for backwards compatibility with integr...13.3Number Verification 2.0 (CAMARA)Frictionless mobile-number verification that confirms ownership of the MSISDN currently in use on the devic...13.3Quality of Service ProfilesLists the QoS profiles a developer may request via Quality on Demand, including profile identifiers, throug...13.3Quality on DemandCAMARA Quality on Demand API for requesting a temporary QoS uplift on a specific UE session — used for clou...13.3SIM Swap (CAMARA)CAMARA SIM Swap API that returns the timestamp of the most recent SIM change for a given MSISDN (latestSimC...13.3Bryte IQ Network-as-a-Service APIBryte IQ is Charter Communications' NaaS developer platform built on the Linux Foundation's CAMARA open API...13.0
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface

Companies reaching this through an API (1)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “CAMARA” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

Charter Communications

Score breakdown

Frequency
46.0
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.5
spread across providers
Quality lift
40.7
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Where this tag sits

Telecommunications broader

Related tags

Network APIs 32 co-occurrences Open Gateway 26 co-occurrences SIM Swap 22 co-occurrences Mobile Network Operator 20 co-occurrences 5G 27 co-occurrences Number Verification 12 co-occurrences Broadband 21 co-occurrences TM Forum 8 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag37
Api tag32

Markets provisional

Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.

MarketShare of the market's providers
Telecom Network APIs (CAMARA)36%

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 36 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged CAMARA, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
36
of 37 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
40.8
+16.7 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
24.8
+10.7 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
3–86.9
median 43.8 · σ 19.7
How the 36 split by band
Exemplar 1Strong 9Developing 11Thin 6Emerging 5Minimal 4
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 48.2 24.5 +23.7 36
Contract Quality 38.5 18.6 +19.9 36
Operational Transparency 29.4 13.2 +16.2 36
Contract Governance 21.4 9.7 +11.7 36
Discoverability 66.2 59.1 +7.1 36
Access Clarity 33.9 30 +3.9 36

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 19% 18% +1
MCP server (first-party) 19% 16% +3
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 42% 13% +29
Security 100% 99% +1
Arazzo workflows 6% 1% +5
Governance rules 64% 36% +28

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Infobip 86.9
  2. 2 KPN 65.4
  3. 3 Netcracker 64.6
  4. 4 Orange Business 64.2
  5. 5 Optus 62.1
  6. 6 ETSI 60.3
  7. 7 GSMA 58.8
  8. 8 Nokia 56.5
  9. 9 Plumma 56.5
  10. 10 América Móvil 55.1
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Infobip 61.3
  2. 2 Nokia 43.9
  3. 3 SK Telecom 43.4
  4. 4 Orange Business 43.2
  5. 5 Telia Company 43
  6. 6 ETSI 41.7
  7. 7 GSMA 40.2
  8. 8 América Móvil 35.4
  9. 9 CAMARA Project 35.3
  10. 10 KPN 35.1
All 37 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 36 carry a score (97%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 27 of 36 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/camara"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.