EU eIDAS Trust Services (qualified trust service providers)
Register market (eu eidas trusted lists via legal-esignature edges; swiss zertes trusted list). The Kin Score Market layer reads each provider in its market: who it integrates with, how deep those integrations go, and where the market publishes its own structure. Methodology.
Where this market publishes its structure
- EU List of Trusted Lists (ec.europa.eu/tools/lotl/eu-lotl.xml) + national Trusted Lists machine-readable, read by sweep-legal.py (legal-esignature); NOT re-read; its 15 linked providers' edges reused (12 pass the market-fit gate)
- eIDAS TL browser API (eidas.ec.europa.eu/efda/tl-browser/api/v1/browser/tl/EU) machine-readable, API view of the same register; not re-read
- Swiss Trusted List, ZertES (trustedlist.tsl-switzerland.ch/tsl-ch.xml) machine-readable, 5 TSPs, 5 with granted qualified services; 2 linked (swisscom, digicert); BIT held (government); SwissSign, SIGN8 have no repo
- UK trusted list (tscheme.org/UK_TSL/TSL-UKsigned.xml) not machine-readable: SiteGround sgcaptcha bot challenge on every request; not bypassed
- SAS ZertES accredited-bodies list (sas.admin.ch, PDF) not machine-readable: site restructured into seco.admin.ch; the dated PDF now 301s to an HTML landing page
Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.
Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io
Derived 2026-10-23 from the 12 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.
| Tags | E-Signature 75%, Digital Identity 50%, Identity Verification 42%, KYC 25%, eIDAS 25%, Trust Services 25% |
|---|---|
| Tag groups | Documents 75%, Digital Identity 67%, Fraud Prevention 42% |
| Industries | Legal & Compliance Tech 42%, Cybersecurity & Identity 25% |
| Capabilities | Cybersecurity Management 25% |
share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py
Leaders by position (provisional)
Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.
gravity 1 · other companies invest to build on it
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | 62.1 | 100 | 39 / 61 | 0 | 5 | 32 | partner-built 42%, ipaas-bridge 31%, contract 4%, standard 8%, covered 3%, builds-on-platform 8%, distribution 5% |
builds-on 1 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Signicat | 50.4 | 8 | 0 / 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | contract 25%, standard 12%, builds-on-platform 38%, distribution 25% |
regulated 4 · named in a regulator's register or partners' contracts
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evrotrust | 35.8 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | contract 50%, distribution 50% |
| PagoPA | 29.9 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | contract 50%, distribution 50% |
| YouSign | 26.4 thin | 2 | 0 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ipaas-bridge 50%, contract 50% |
| IDnow | 26.2 thin | 1 | 0 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | contract 100% |
standard 2 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InfoCert | 65.2 | 6 | 0 / 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | contract 17%, standard 67%, distribution 17% |
| Swisscom | 57.5 | 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | contract 22%, standard 56%, builds-on-platform 11%, distribution 11% |
core 2 · builds the connectors its customers need
| Provider | Depth | Integrations | In / out | Unknown builder | Distribution | iPaaS bridge | Mix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Docusign | 60.3 | 81 | 20 / 61 | 0 | 1 | 3 | partner-built 29%, provider-built 45%, ipaas-bridge 3%, contract 3%, standard 10%, builds-on-platform 7%, distribution 1% |
| Namirial | 51.5 | 12 | 0 / 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | provider-built 67%, contract 8%, standard 17%, distribution 8% |
mixed 2 · no single mode dominates
Generated 2026-10-24 from API Evangelist's own files; nothing on this page is a model's judgement. Provisional and unweighted; not part of the Kin Score composite or agent readiness. Read the Market layer methodology. Disagree with an edge? Every edge cites its evidence and can be corrected through the normal correction path.