Fraud Prevention
Fraud DetectionFraudAnti-FraudFraud ProtectionFraud ManagementFraud Prevention
Providers using this tag (296)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 15 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 32 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 59 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 52 Limited public surface area
Emerging 73 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 59 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 6 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (122)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 22 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 33 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (38)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Fraud Prevention” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
296 providers carry this tag directly, and 298 counting the 1 narrower tag below — 2 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| RegTech, AML/KYC and Money Transmission | 40% |
| Biometrics Testing (biometric recognition vendors, identity verification depth) | 38% |
| GLEIF LEI Issuers (Legal Entity Identifier infrastructure) | 23% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 265 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Fraud Prevention, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.2 | 24.5 | +10.7 | 265 |
| Contract Quality | 27.9 | 18.6 | +9.3 | 265 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.1 | 13.2 | +6.9 | 265 |
| Access Clarity | 36.4 | 30 | +6.4 | 265 |
| Discoverability | 64.2 | 59.1 | +5.1 | 265 |
| Contract Governance | 13.6 | 9.7 | +3.9 | 265 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 16% | 18% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 15% | 16% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 13% | +1 |
| Security | 97% | 99% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 1% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 45% | 36% | +9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Telnyx 93.5
- 2 MandateShield 78.1
- 3 Telesign 77
- 4 Strivacity 73.5
- 5 Didit 71.9
- 6 Trulioo 71.1
- 7 AlphaLoops FMCSA Carrier Data API 69.2
- 8 Amazon Fraud Detector 68.6
- 9 Signicat 68.1
- 10 Mailboxlayer 67.8
- 1 Telnyx 79.5
- 2 Didit 71.2
- 3 Justt 57
- 4 Clearspeed 56.9
- 5 Gr4vy 55
- 6 Bewary 54.6
- 7 Trulioo 51.9
- 8 Bolt Financial 50.5
- 9 Singular 50
- 10 FLINT Network 49.5
Coverage caveat. 213 of 265 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.