Identity
Providers using this tag (306)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 87 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 75 Limited public surface area
Emerging 74 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 4 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (478)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 29 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 48 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 140 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 150 Limited public surface area
Emerging 104 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 7 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (312)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Identity” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 312 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 294 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Identity, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.2 | 23.2 | +17 | 294 |
| Contract Quality | 28.6 | 17.6 | +11 | 294 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.4 | 13.7 | +10.7 | 294 |
| Access Clarity | 35.3 | 26.5 | +8.8 | 294 |
| Discoverability | 66.3 | 58.1 | +8.2 | 294 |
| Contract Governance | 11.2 | 6.3 | +4.9 | 294 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 17% | 14% | +3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 16% | 12% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 29% | 11% | +18 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 14% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) 82.8
- 2 Canonical 76.3
- 3 Okta 75.3
- 4 Aembit 72.6
- 5 Tvarka ATK API 70.1
- 6 Lucid 68.4
- 7 Strivacity 67.9
- 8 Amazon Cognito 67
- 9 Gravitee 65.2
- 10 Bolt Financial 65
- 1 Didit 59.8
- 2 Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) 56.3
- 3 Clawvisor 55.8
- 4 Aembit 54.6
- 5 Okta 53
- 6 Bolt Financial 52.4
- 7 ezoic 51.3
- 8 Permutive 50.2
- 9 Sadq 48.2
- 10 Green Helix 47.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.