Authorization
AuthorizationsAuthorization
Providers using this tag (64)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (210)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 18 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 44 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 68 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 57 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (183)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Authorization” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 183 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 61 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Authorization, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 50.2 | 23.2 | +27 | 61 |
| Contract Quality | 42.7 | 17.6 | +25.1 | 61 |
| Operational Transparency | 36.2 | 13.7 | +22.5 | 61 |
| Access Clarity | 43.9 | 26.5 | +17.4 | 61 |
| Contract Governance | 16.4 | 6.3 | +10.1 | 61 |
| Discoverability | 64.6 | 58.1 | +6.5 | 61 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 30% | 14% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 24% | 12% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 92% | 98% | -6 |
| Arazzo workflows | 14% | 2% | +12 |
| Governance rules | 41% | 14% | +27 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Kinde 87.5
- 2 Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) 82.8
- 3 Okta 75.3
- 4 Arcade 72.9
- 5 Aembit 72.6
- 6 Authentik 71.6
- 7 Clerk 71.4
- 8 Auth0 70
- 9 Strivacity 67.9
- 10 Frontegg 65
- 1 WorkOS 59.4
- 2 Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) 56.3
- 3 Clawvisor 55.8
- 4 Aembit 54.6
- 5 Okta 53
- 6 Kinde 48.1
- 7 Clerk 45.9
- 8 Auth0 37.2
- 9 Ping Identity 36.5
- 10 Gluu 36
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.