OpenID Connect
OIDCOpenID Connect
Providers using this tag (52)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (224)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 11 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 20 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 43 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 61 Limited public surface area
Emerging 89 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (175)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “OpenID Connect” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 175 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Identity and Auth | 68% |
| OpenID Certified Implementations (OIDC, FAPI, OpenID4VC) | 31% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 52 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged OpenID Connect, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 53.6 | 23.2 | +30.4 | 52 |
| Operational Transparency | 39.2 | 13 | +26.2 | 52 |
| Contract Quality | 41.7 | 17.2 | +24.5 | 52 |
| Access Clarity | 36.8 | 23.9 | +12.9 | 52 |
| Discoverability | 69 | 57.9 | +11.1 | 52 |
| Contract Governance | 14.7 | 6.5 | +8.2 | 52 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 27% | 13% | +14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 12% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 46% | 11% | +35 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 35% | 16% | +19 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Kinde 82.4
- 2 Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) 81.8
- 3 The Colony 74.8
- 4 LINE 72.7
- 5 Auth0 70.4
- 6 Authentik 70.1
- 7 Strivacity 68.5
- 8 Amazon Cognito 65.7
- 9 Gluu 62.9
- 10 Stytch 60.4
- 1 The Colony 65.4
- 2 WorkOS 58.8
- 3 Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) 55.1
- 4 Kinde 50.9
- 5 LINE 47.9
- 6 Dream Sports 39.8
- 7 Auth0 37.2
- 8 Futureverse 36.7
- 9 Doximity 36.1
- 10 AOL 36.1
Coverage caveat. 36 of 52 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 24 October 2026, across 31984 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.