OpenID Connect
Providers using this tag (71)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 21 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (176)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 51 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 69 Limited public surface area
Emerging 34 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (135)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “OpenID Connect” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 135 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 71 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged OpenID Connect, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43.4 | 23.4 | +20 | 71 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.7 | 14 | +13.7 | 71 |
| Contract Quality | 31.6 | 19.8 | +11.8 | 71 |
| Contract Governance | 17.1 | 6.4 | +10.7 | 71 |
| Access Clarity | 37.1 | 26.5 | +10.6 | 71 |
| Discoverability | 69.8 | 61.2 | +8.6 | 71 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 15% | 10% | +5 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 13% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 77% | 11% | +66 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 14% | +11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Kinde 86
- 2 Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) 77.9
- 3 Authentik 69.1
- 4 LINE 69.1
- 5 Frontegg 67.5
- 6 Clerk 65.8
- 7 Strivacity 65.7
- 8 Gluu 63.5
- 9 Auth0 60.8
- 10 Airtm 60.5
- 1 Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) 52
- 2 Airtm 49.4
- 3 Kinde 48.5
- 4 Clerk 46.3
- 5 LINE 44.9
- 6 Dream Sports 41
- 7 TrustArc 38.7
- 8 Auth0 37.9
- 9 Queensland University of Technology 37.3
- 10 Hopae, Inc. 35.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.