Maritime Logistics (ocean shipping, eBL, ports)

Where this market publishes its structure

• DCSA carrier members (dcsa.org/about-us/members) machine-readable, 10 carriers with an implementation statement; 6 linked; Evergreen / HMM / Yang Ming not in catalog; PIL links an image
• DCSA+ partner programme (dcsa.org/get-involved/dcsa-plus) machine-readable, 25 partners; 11 with a website; 1 linked (DNV); 2 shippers held
• IG of P&I Clubs approved electronic bill of lading systems (igpandi.org/article/ig-approved-electronic-bill-of-lading-systems/) machine-readable, 21 systems, names only; Wikidata P856 found 1; 0 linked
• IPCSA members (ipcsa.international/about/members///) machine-readable, 50 member pages, 47 with a website; 0 held by the catalog
• IMO GISIS not machine-readable: login (IMO web accounts); no public company register
• DCSA conformance results not machine-readable: conformance toolkit is published, results are not; no public register
• FIATA eBL not machine-readable: standard document, no platform register
• BIMCO members not machine-readable: member directory behind login

Own = declares at least one integration itself; covered = visible only because an aggregator, standards body, regulator or partner contract names it; distribution-only = listed only on cloud marketplaces it sells through, a channel reported beside, never counted as its own declared integrations; undeclared = nothing we can read, so no number; declares_compatibility = providers with a `compatible` shape vote, report only (kin, 2026-10-13): never counted as own, never in depth or position.

Taxonomy how this market maps onto apis.io

Derived 2026-10-15 from the 47 providers in this market we could resolve in the catalog. The percentage is the share of those providers carrying each one; it describes the market, not the tag or industry. Tag groups have no page of their own yet, so they are listed unlinked.

share of resolved cohort carrying it; tags >=0.20 & >=3 members (max 12, junk dropped), tag_groups >=0.20 (cooccurrence, non-cross-cutting; max 8), industries >=0.20 (max 6), areas >=0.10 (max 6; areas are keyword-matched and sparse), capabilities L1 >=0.20 (max 8); derive-market-taxonomy.py

Leaders by position (provisional)

Provisional: grouped by position, depth compared within a position only. Distribution (cloud marketplaces) and iPaaS bridges are counted beside position, never inside it. Unknown-builder listings are left out of position shares and counted here.

builds-on 1 · publishes apps on other platforms' stores

covered 7 · reached mainly through aggregators

standard 2 · listed by a voluntary standard's own directory

distribution 1 · only sells through cloud marketplaces

undeclared 36 · declares nothing we can read: no number