Maritime
Providers using this tag (66)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 31 Almost no public developer surface
Harbor LabBlueworldtechnologiesBlue Water AutonomyAmogyOcean AeroHavocAIVatn SystemsVakeREGENT CraftDP WorldWindwardSeafairCaptain's EyeHapag-LloydMSC Mediterranean Shipping CompanyZIM Integrated Shipping ServicesAliciaBotsPierSight SpaceOcean Network ExpressThayerMahanAndrenamAICEOrbital InsightFleetzeroIridiumPhilly ShipyardDimeqSeasatsCOSCO ShippingFederal Maritime CommissionArcboatcompany
APIs with this tag (15)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
DNV Veracity Platform APIDNV Veracity is an open and secure industry data platform facilitating exchange of datasets, APIs, applicat...DNV Vessel RegisterDNV Vessel Register provides access to DNV's public registry of classified vessels including vessel identif...Xweather Maritime APIMarine and ocean weather data
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Kpler AIS Data FeedGlobal vessel-position data feed launched September 2025 (replacing MarineTraffic AIS and the acquired Spir...MarineTraffic APIMarineTraffic data services API (property of Kpler) for real-time and historical vessel tracking - current ...MarineTraffic Vessels APIGraphQL API for vessel intelligence on 220,000+ vessels - technical particulars, dimensions, and capacity p...IPCSA Port Community Systems APIThe International Port Community Systems Association (IPCSA) represents Port Community System operators and...NAVCEN AIS Vessel Information Verification ServiceThe Vessel Information Verification Service (VIVS) is a NAVCEN web service that allows retrieval of a vesse...
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Spire Maritime Port Events APIGraphQL port-event queries - `portEventsByVessel`, `portEventsByLocation`, and `portEventsByShipType` - sur...Spire Maritime 2.0 API (GraphQL)Single GraphQL endpoint delivering Spire's satellite AIS maritime data - vessel positions, voyages, port ca...CMA CGM Booking Request APIBooking request API allowing shippers, NVOCCs, and freight forwarders to submit, amend, and cancel ocean bo...CMA CGM Track and Trace APIPublic and private REST API exposing CMA CGM, ANL, APL, CNC, and Containerships shipment events aligned wit...Inmarsat Fleet Edge Assurance APIThe Fleet Edge Assurance API gives maritime fleet operators programmatic access to terminal health, link as...Inmarsat Fleet Edge Hardware Replacement APIThe Fleet Edge Hardware Replacement API supports lifecycle workflows for swapping and provisioning Fleet Ed...
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (2)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Maritime” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
52.5
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
24.6
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
10.6
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Where this tag sits
67 providers carry this tag directly, and 88 counting the 5 narrower tags below — 22 more to reach.
Ocean Freight
26 providers
Container Shipping
11 providers
Container Tracking
7 providers
Vessel Tracking
12 providers
Ports
8 providers
Related tags
Vessel Tracking 12 co-occurrences
AIS 15 co-occurrences
Ports 11 co-occurrences
Ocean Freight 8 co-occurrences
Shipping 24 co-occurrences
Container Shipping 6 co-occurrences
Container Tracking 5 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag67
Api tag16
Openapi tag1
Openapi op tag1
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 66 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Maritime, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
66
of 67 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
20.2
-2.7 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
10.4
-1.5 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.3–48.8
median 13.9 · σ 15.6
How the 66 split by band
Exemplar 0Strong 0Developing 11Thin 13Emerging 12Minimal 30
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 18.8 | 17.6 | +1.2 | 66 |
| Contract Governance | 6.1 | 6.3 | -0.2 | 66 |
| Discoverability | 57.2 | 58.1 | -0.9 | 66 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.8 | 13.7 | -2.9 | 66 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 18.3 | 23.2 | -4.9 | 66 |
| Access Clarity | 21.3 | 26.5 | -5.2 | 66 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 5% | 14% | -9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 5% | 12% | -7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 11% | +1 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 14% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 VesselFinder 48.8
- 2 Maersk 48.1
- 3 DNV 46.9
- 4 Sofar Ocean 46.6
- 5 SERTICA 46
- 6 Nortech 45
- 7 Navis (Kaleris) 43.4
- 8 Starlink 43.3
- 9 MarineTraffic 43.2
- 10 Xweather 43.2
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Starlink 38.3
- 2 SEDNA 35.1
- 3 Sofar Ocean 32.7
- 4 MarineTraffic 32.3
- 5 SERTICA 29.2
- 6 Xweather 28.7
- 7 Datalastic 28.4
- 8 DNV 26.3
- 9 Nortech 25
- 10 Tomorrow.io 24.8
All 67 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 66 carry a score (99%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 50 of 66 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 50 of 66 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.