Data Enrichment
Providers using this tag (72)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 23 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 6 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (20)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
1Lookup REST APIRESTful API over HTTPS covering all 1Lookup products (phone/email/IP validation, fraud, enrichment, B2B dat...Harmonic MCP ServerHosted, agent-native MCP server exposing 40+ tools for enrichment, search, saved searches, lists, investors...Harmonic REST & GraphQL APIREST API for company search, enrichment, saved searches, list management, and bulk operations, plus a full ...
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Landbase Platform APIThe Landbase cloud gateway that landbase-cli calls in platform mode. It backs natural-language audience sea...LeO MCP ConnectorFirst-party, hosted, remote MCP server exposing LeO's insurance intelligence -- 25M+ US businesses across 2...LeO Public APIREST API for account entitlements, credit balance, commercial-insurance prospect search across 134 filter p...Tofu Enrich APICredit-metered company and people data enrichment. Two entities — company (keyed on domain or LinkedIn URL)...Aidentified Contact Matching APIBulk contact matching and enrichment. A customer creates a dataset, uploads a UTF-8 CSV of contacts as a da...
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
BardeenBardeen is an AI-powered automation platform for automating repetitive tasks across web applications.InfutorData Activate APIThe batch counterpart to the real-time LeadiD queries — a versioned REST surface on myJornaya for driving A...Cloud Dynamics API (Intricately)The Cloud Dynamics API (formerly the Intricately API) provides access to cloud adoption, usage, and spend d...Contentsquare Enrichment APIREST API for sending enrichment data batches into Contentsquare, enabling teams to merge first-party data w...Salt Edge Data Enrichment APICategorize and enrich transactions, identify merchants, and surface financial insights.
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
CaptionsTimestamped/segmented video transcript retrieval, up to 50 videos per call. Billed per transcript returned.JobsJob posting collection that segments by publish window/area to exceed the public 1,000-result cap. Billed p...PlacesLocal business data collection via geo point + radius sweep with deduplication on place ID; optional email ...VerifyEmail verification via syntax, disposable-domain, MX and SMTP dialogue checks (no message sent), up to 100 ...PREDIK Location Intelligence & Foot Traffic Data APIPartner-delivered, contact-sales data API that serves PREDIK's enriched location-intelligence products - PO...
Companies reaching this through an API (3)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data Enrichment” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Frequency
54.3
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
2.0
spread across providers
Quality lift
60.0
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor
Related tags
Sales Intelligence 29 co-occurrences
Company Data 19 co-occurrences
Contact Data 13 co-occurrences
B2B Data 13 co-occurrences
Firmographics 10 co-occurrences
Enrichment 11 co-occurrences
Lead Generation 17 co-occurrences
Identity Resolution 9 co-occurrences
Where this tag comes from
Provider tag77
Api tag21
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 76 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Enrichment, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
Providers
76
of 77 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
49.3
+26.4 vs catalog 22.9
Mean Agent Readiness
34.3
+22.4 vs catalog 11.9
Spread
3.3–87.3
median 54.5 · σ 18.6
How the 76 split by band
Exemplar 13Strong 25Developing 19Thin 10Emerging 4Minimal 5
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 64.4 | 26.5 | +37.9 | 76 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 51.2 | 23.2 | +28 | 76 |
| Operational Transparency | 39.1 | 13.7 | +25.4 | 76 |
| Contract Quality | 39.1 | 17.6 | +21.5 | 76 |
| Discoverability | 71.1 | 58.1 | +13 | 76 |
| Contract Governance | 15.7 | 6.3 | +9.4 | 76 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
What this cohort publishes
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 58% | 14% | +44 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 57% | 12% | +45 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 41% | 11% | +30 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
Top by Kin Score
- 1 ZoomInfo 87.3
- 2 lemlist 73.2
- 3 DeBounce 70.4
- 4 Cracked API 70.3
- 5 Leadspace 70
- 6 Unify 70
- 7 Context.dev 67.2
- 8 Snov.io 67.2
- 9 Seamless.AI 67
- 10 People Data Labs 66.8
Top by Agent Readiness
- 1 Cracked API 68.5
- 2 ZoomInfo 65.8
- 3 lemlist 65.8
- 4 The Hog 65.5
- 5 Parallel 65
- 6 Sumble 61.5
- 7 DeBounce 60.8
- 8 Demandbase 60.6
- 9 Parallel Web Systems 60.2
- 10 Unify 60
All 77 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the
catalog; 76 carry a score (99%).
The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 47 of 76 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Coverage caveat. 47 of 76 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.