Sales Intelligence
Providers using this tag (83)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 12 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 23 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 22 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 10 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (12)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 4 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (1)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Sales Intelligence” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 81 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Sales Intelligence, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 61.3 | 26.5 | +34.8 | 81 |
| Contract Quality | 38.6 | 17.6 | +21 | 81 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 44.2 | 23.2 | +21 | 81 |
| Operational Transparency | 33 | 13.7 | +19.3 | 81 |
| Discoverability | 69.6 | 58.1 | +11.5 | 81 |
| Contract Governance | 15.3 | 6.3 | +9 | 81 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 64% | 14% | +50 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 63% | 12% | +51 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 47% | 11% | +36 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 17% | 14% | +3 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ZoomInfo 87.3
- 2 Surfe 75.6
- 3 Lusha 72.7
- 4 Hunter 71.9
- 5 6sense 71.7
- 6 Coresignal 70.1
- 7 UserGems 70.1
- 8 Leadspace 70
- 9 Wappalyzer 68.1
- 10 Common Room 67.2
- 1 ZoomInfo 65.8
- 2 The Hog 65.5
- 3 Common Room 63.8
- 4 Lusha 63.1
- 5 Starbridge 62.9
- 6 Sumble 61.5
- 7 FullEnrich 60.7
- 8 Demandbase 60.6
- 9 Apollo.io 60.4
- 10 Caretta 60.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.