Company Data
Providers using this tag (64)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 16 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 19 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 8 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (22)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 7 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 2 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (6)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Company Data” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| GLEIF LEI Issuers (Legal Entity Identifier infrastructure) | 20% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 62 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Company Data, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 56.8 | 30 | +26.8 | 62 |
| Contract Quality | 44.7 | 18.6 | +26.1 | 62 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 48.6 | 24.5 | +24.1 | 62 |
| Operational Transparency | 34.1 | 13.2 | +20.9 | 62 |
| Contract Governance | 23.1 | 9.7 | +13.4 | 62 |
| Discoverability | 71 | 59.1 | +11.9 | 62 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 52% | 18% | +34 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 53% | 16% | +37 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 35% | 13% | +22 |
| Security | 100% | 99% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 1% | +7 |
| Governance rules | 81% | 36% | +45 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 ZoomInfo 86.8
- 2 OpenMercantil 79.4
- 3 Apier.no 72
- 4 Context.dev 70.4
- 5 Demandbase 70.1
- 6 Coresignal 69.7
- 7 akta.pro 69.3
- 8 Brand API (Brandfetch) 68.4
- 9 The Companies API 67.3
- 10 Explorium 66.4
- 1 Sirenic 75.6
- 2 Apier.no 67.6
- 3 The Hog 65.6
- 4 ZoomInfo 64.3
- 5 Caplight 60.7
- 6 Context.dev 59.5
- 7 Demandbase 59.4
- 8 Harmonic.ai 58.7
- 9 Explorium 58.6
- 10 Topograph 57.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.