Prospecting
Prospectingprospecting
Providers using this tag (28)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 6 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (10)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 1 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 28 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Prospecting, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 69 | 22.3 | +46.7 | 28 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 46.4 | 17.9 | +28.5 | 28 |
| Operational Transparency | 39.4 | 11.3 | +28.1 | 28 |
| Contract Quality | 42.5 | 17.5 | +25 | 28 |
| Discoverability | 77.3 | 60.4 | +16.9 | 28 |
| Contract Governance | 19.7 | 6.4 | +13.3 | 28 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 64% | 16% | +48 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 57% | 7% | +50 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 57% | 9% | +48 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 14% | 13% | +1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Lusha 71.7
- 2 Hunter 71.4
- 3 Surfe 70.6
- 4 Outreach 70.5
- 5 Seamless.AI 69.8
- 6 Apollo.io 64.2
- 7 RocketReach 63.3
- 8 Xiaoman (OKKI) 61.9
- 9 Clay 61.3
- 10 Clearbit (HubSpot Breeze Intelligence) 60.6
- 1 Seamless.AI 58.7
- 2 Lusha 57.6
- 3 Apollo.io 55.3
- 4 Gojiberry AI 55.2
- 5 NextRoll 52.2
- 6 Hunter 51.7
- 7 LeadIQ 51.1
- 8 Surfe 47.5
- 9 Outreach 46.4
- 10 Clay 41.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/prospecting"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/prospecting"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/prospecting/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.