Email Verification
Email ValidationEmail Verification
Providers using this tag (35)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 5 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (40)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 11 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 6 Limited public surface area
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (10)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Email Verification” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 35 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Email Verification, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 70.4 | 26.5 | +43.9 | 35 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 60.5 | 23.2 | +37.3 | 35 |
| Operational Transparency | 47.6 | 13.7 | +33.9 | 35 |
| Contract Quality | 46.8 | 17.6 | +29.2 | 35 |
| Discoverability | 72.6 | 58.1 | +14.5 | 35 |
| Contract Governance | 15.6 | 6.3 | +9.3 | 35 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 69% | 14% | +55 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 69% | 12% | +57 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 31% | 11% | +20 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 23% | 14% | +9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Hunter 71.9
- 2 DeBounce 70.4
- 3 SendPulse 69.5
- 4 Mailboxlayer 68.9
- 5 Wappalyzer 68.1
- 6 Snov.io 67.2
- 7 ZeroBounce 67.1
- 8 Instantly 66
- 9 1Lookup 64.2
- 10 Enrich 63.8
- 1 DeBounce 60.8
- 2 Instantly 60
- 3 1Lookup 55.4
- 4 MailerSend 55.4
- 5 Snov.io 55.2
- 6 SendPulse 53.6
- 7 Hunter 53.4
- 8 Wappalyzer 50
- 9 APIVerve 50
- 10 Enrich 46.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.