emerging · 0.0 capabilitymarket actionresourcedomain

Data Quality

Score 22.6 / 100 60 providers +14 via APIs 27 APIs Search apis.io →

Providers using this tag (60)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 24 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 10 Limited public surface area
Emerging 13 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface

APIs with this tag (27)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (14)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data Quality” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

0xArchive Aporia data.world Databricks La Poste Groupe Ordnance Survey Pabbly pVerify Qlik Qlik Sense RudderStack SAP SpecterOps The Trade Desk

Score breakdown

Frequency
53.9
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
1.7
spread across providers
Quality lift
43.5
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

Data Observability 15 co-occurrences Data Lineage 16 co-occurrences Data Governance 18 co-occurrences Lineage 7 co-occurrences Data Engineering 9 co-occurrences Email Verification 7 co-occurrences Snowflake 7 co-occurrences Metadata Management 5 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Api tag27
Provider tag60
Openapi tag6
Openapi op tag27

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 60 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Quality, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
60
all scored
Mean Kin Score
38.3
+14.3 vs catalog 24
Mean Agent Readiness
22
+9.6 vs catalog 12.4
Spread
4.2–71.7
median 40.7 · σ 16.4
How the 60 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 8Developing 24Thin 10Emerging 13Minimal 3
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Developer Ergonomics 43 23.4 +19.6 60
Access Clarity 43.4 26.5 +16.9 60
Contract Quality 35.4 20.1 +15.3 60
Operational Transparency 26.6 14 +12.6 60
Discoverability 68.5 61 +7.5 60
Contract Governance 12.7 6.5 +6.2 60

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 37% 10% +27
MCP server (first-party) 35% 13% +22
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 8% 11% -3
Security 100% 96% +4
Arazzo workflows 2% 2% 0
Governance rules 17% 13% +4

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 Soda 71.7
  2. 2 Mailboxlayer 69.5
  3. 3 ZeroBounce 65.6
  4. 4 Monte Carlo 65.5
  5. 5 Refuel 60.4
  6. 6 Metaplane 58.7
  7. 7 NeverBounce 58.6
  8. 8 Acceldata 58
  9. 9 Kickbox 56.8
  10. 10 EU Open Data Portal 54.8
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 Monte Carlo 59
  2. 2 Acceldata 53.8
  3. 3 Syncari 50
  4. 4 Collate 47.5
  5. 5 uChecker 45.1
  6. 6 Revefi 44.1
  7. 7 NeverBounce 41.5
  8. 8 Experian 41.1
  9. 9 Verato 40
  10. 10 Kickbox 39
All 60 members of this roster resolve to a scored provider in the catalog.Generated from the catalog build of 20 September 2026, across 27620 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/data-quality"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/data-quality"
The distribution (Pro)
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/data-quality/stats" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"

Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.