Data Quality
Data Qualitydata qualitydata-quality
Providers using this tag (68)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 15 Limited public surface area
Emerging 14 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (24)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 3 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 2 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 68 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Quality, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 43 | 17.9 | +25.1 | 68 |
| Access Clarity | 43.7 | 22.3 | +21.4 | 68 |
| Contract Quality | 36.3 | 17.5 | +18.8 | 68 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.2 | 11.3 | +14.9 | 68 |
| Discoverability | 71.3 | 60.4 | +10.9 | 68 |
| Contract Governance | 16.5 | 6.4 | +10.1 | 68 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 47% | 16% | +31 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 31% | 7% | +24 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 12% | 9% | +3 |
| Security | 100% | 88% | +12 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 21% | 13% | +8 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 RudderStack 80.2
- 2 SendPulse 75.7
- 3 Mailboxlayer 73.4
- 4 ZeroBounce 69.2
- 5 SAP Emarsys 66.4
- 6 Refuel 64.6
- 7 Ordnance Survey 62.6
- 8 NeverBounce 62.2
- 9 Databricks 59.1
- 10 Kickbox 57.9
- 1 SendPulse 55.8
- 2 RudderStack 52
- 3 Verato 46.5
- 4 Collate 46
- 5 The Trade Desk 43
- 6 Refuel 41.8
- 7 Databricks 40.1
- 8 SAP Emarsys 37.9
- 9 uChecker 36.7
- 10 NeverBounce 36.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.