Data Governance
Providers using this tag (83)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 14 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (24)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 14 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (9)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Data Governance” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 80 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Governance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 42.3 | 23.4 | +18.9 | 80 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.2 | 14 | +14.2 | 80 |
| Access Clarity | 39.9 | 26.5 | +13.4 | 80 |
| Contract Quality | 30.6 | 20.1 | +10.5 | 80 |
| Contract Governance | 11.8 | 6.5 | +5.3 | 80 |
| Discoverability | 65.5 | 61 | +4.5 | 80 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 37% | 10% | +27 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 43% | 13% | +30 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 11% | +8 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 20% | 13% | +7 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Snowflake 80.5
- 2 Confluent 78.1
- 3 Soda 71.7
- 4 OneTrust 70.7
- 5 Sigma Computing 68.8
- 6 Vendia 62.4
- 7 Nexla 62.2
- 8 Microsoft Purview 60.2
- 9 IBM 60
- 10 Amazon Lake Formation 59.4
- 1 Sigma Computing 61.7
- 2 Druva 58.4
- 3 data.world 56.4
- 4 OneTrust 55.9
- 5 DataHub 51.4
- 6 Syncari 50
- 7 Confluent 49.4
- 8 Sweep 48.5
- 9 mParticle 48.4
- 10 ALTR 47.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.