Data Governance
Data Governancedata-governance
Providers using this tag (85)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 21 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 17 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (25)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 85 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Data Governance, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 37.7 | 17.9 | +19.8 | 85 |
| Operational Transparency | 24.5 | 11.3 | +13.2 | 85 |
| Access Clarity | 35.2 | 22.3 | +12.9 | 85 |
| Contract Quality | 28.9 | 17.5 | +11.4 | 85 |
| Contract Governance | 13.3 | 6.4 | +6.9 | 85 |
| Discoverability | 66.7 | 60.4 | +6.3 | 85 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 39% | 16% | +23 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 28% | 7% | +21 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 9% | +5 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 13% | 2% | +11 |
| Governance rules | 25% | 13% | +12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 RudderStack 80.2
- 2 Vendia 63.7
- 3 IBM 62.6
- 4 Kiteworks 60.1
- 5 Immuta 59.7
- 6 Amazon Lake Formation 59.4
- 7 Databricks 59.1
- 8 Red Hat 59.1
- 9 mParticle 57.2
- 10 Microsoft Purview 57.1
- 1 Red Hat 52.3
- 2 RudderStack 52
- 3 mParticle 50.5
- 4 ALTR 47.9
- 5 Sweep 46.8
- 6 Collate 46
- 7 MINE 41.9
- 8 Oracle 41.9
- 9 Databricks 40.1
- 10 IBM 39.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.