Neobank
Providers using this tag (49)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Emerging 18 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 23 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (5)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Emerging 5 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 47 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Neobank, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 24.6 | 26.5 | -1.9 | 47 |
| Operational Transparency | 9.9 | 13.7 | -3.8 | 47 |
| Contract Governance | 1.8 | 6.3 | -4.5 | 47 |
| Discoverability | 53.2 | 58.1 | -4.9 | 47 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.3 | 23.2 | -6.9 | 47 |
| Contract Quality | 8 | 17.6 | -9.6 | 47 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 14% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 9% | 11% | -2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 2% | 14% | -12 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Qonto 67.6
- 2 Cash App 58.3
- 3 Up 50.1
- 4 Chime 40.4
- 5 Cuenca 39.5
- 6 Ualá 36.8
- 7 bunq 36
- 8 Number26 33.9
- 9 Open (open.money) 25.5
- 10 Copper Banking 21.5
Coverage caveat. 45 of 47 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 5 October 2026, across 29093 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.