GraphQL
GraphQLGraphqlgraphql
Providers using this tag (554)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 18 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 50 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 145 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 214 Limited public surface area
Emerging 122 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (697)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 22 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 126 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 159 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 272 Limited public surface area
Emerging 115 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 554 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged GraphQL, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 39.8 | 17.5 | +22.3 | 554 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.3 | 17.9 | +18.4 | 554 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.7 | 11.3 | +15.4 | 554 |
| Access Clarity | 36.2 | 22.3 | +13.9 | 554 |
| Discoverability | 73.5 | 60.4 | +13.1 | 554 |
| Contract Governance | 11.1 | 6.4 | +4.7 | 554 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 35% | 16% | +19 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 7% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 23% | 9% | +14 |
| Security | 99% | 88% | +11 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 26% | 13% | +13 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Medplum 91.3
- 2 Salesforce 83.3
- 3 Mailchimp 81.5
- 4 Canvas LMS 76.2
- 5 Highnote 75.4
- 6 Optimizely 75.1
- 7 Attentive 73.4
- 8 Fireflies.ai 73.2
- 9 Adobe Suite 71.2
- 10 Prismic 70.3
- 1 Adobe Suite 61.5
- 2 Fireflies.ai 61
- 3 Harmonic.ai 58.1
- 4 Hyperice 55
- 5 Photon 53.8
- 6 Salsify 53.4
- 7 Acoustic 53
- 8 Brand API (Brandfetch) 52.4
- 9 NextRoll 52.2
- 10 Salesforce 52.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/graphql"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/graphql"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/graphql/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.