GraphQL
Providers using this tag (378)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 85 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 152 Limited public surface area
Emerging 93 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (726)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 113 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 52 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 140 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 284 Limited public surface area
Emerging 132 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (193)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “GraphQL” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 193 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 377 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged GraphQL, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.1 | 23.2 | +16.9 | 377 |
| Contract Quality | 30.3 | 17.6 | +12.7 | 377 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.3 | 13.7 | +12.6 | 377 |
| Discoverability | 69.3 | 58.1 | +11.2 | 377 |
| Access Clarity | 35.7 | 26.5 | +9.2 | 377 |
| Contract Governance | 9.7 | 6.3 | +3.4 | 377 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 35% | 14% | +21 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 27% | 12% | +15 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 24% | 11% | +13 |
| Security | 99% | 98% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 WSO2 79.9
- 2 Postman 79.6
- 3 Contentstack 75.1
- 4 Atlassian Compass 72.6
- 5 Fireflies.ai 72.6
- 6 dotCMS 71.9
- 7 Virto Commerce 71.4
- 8 Prismic 71.1
- 9 Canvas 68.2
- 10 Buildkite 68
- 1 Builder.io 64.2
- 2 Fireflies.ai 60.4
- 3 Art Blocks 60
- 4 Medusa 58.9
- 5 Harmonic.ai 58.1
- 6 Anvil 57.9
- 7 Postman 54.9
- 8 LeadIQ 53.8
- 9 Prismic 53.6
- 10 Acoustic 53
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.