GraphQL
Graph QlGraphQLGraphqlgraphql
Providers using this tag (376)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 25 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 106 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 146 Limited public surface area
Emerging 85 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (721)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 109 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 62 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 194 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 255 Limited public surface area
Emerging 98 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (203)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “GraphQL” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 203 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 374 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged GraphQL, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.8 | 23.4 | +16.4 | 374 |
| Contract Quality | 35.2 | 19.8 | +15.4 | 374 |
| Operational Transparency | 26.2 | 13.9 | +12.3 | 374 |
| Discoverability | 72.2 | 61.2 | +11 | 374 |
| Access Clarity | 35.7 | 26.5 | +9.2 | 374 |
| Contract Governance | 9.6 | 6.4 | +3.2 | 374 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 26% | 10% | +16 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 32% | 13% | +19 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 23% | 11% | +12 |
| Security | 99% | 96% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 15% | 14% | +1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Virto Commerce 74.1
- 2 Canvas 73.7
- 3 Postman 72.5
- 4 Highnote 71.8
- 5 dotCMS 70.4
- 6 Fireflies.ai 70.3
- 7 Atlassian Compass 70.2
- 8 Prismic 68.9
- 9 Healthie 68.2
- 10 ESRI ArcGIS 65.8
- 1 Medusa 61.1
- 2 Fireflies.ai 60.4
- 3 Harmonic.ai 58.1
- 4 ESRI ArcGIS 56
- 5 Photon 53.8
- 6 LeadIQ 53.8
- 7 Prismic 53.6
- 8 Acoustic 53
- 9 Conga 50.5
- 10 Atlassian Compass 50.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.