Collection
collectionsCollection
Providers using this tag (45)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 1 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 12 Limited public surface area
Emerging 16 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (258)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 14 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 41 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 105 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 69 Limited public surface area
Emerging 26 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (217)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Collection” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 217 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 45 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Collection, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 27.6 | 17.8 | +9.8 | 45 |
| Access Clarity | 31.7 | 26.5 | +5.2 | 45 |
| Discoverability | 62.5 | 58 | +4.5 | 45 |
| Operational Transparency | 17.7 | 13.8 | +3.9 | 45 |
| Contract Governance | 8.5 | 6.3 | +2.2 | 45 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.3 | 23.3 | +2 | 45 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 15% | -2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 13% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 0% | 12% | -12 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 22% | 13% | +9 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Postman 73.7
- 2 Brandfolder 57.4
- 3 Moniepoint 53.3
- 4 Tabs 51.7
- 5 Paga 50.4
- 6 Veritus 49.5
- 7 Rarible 45
- 8 Ansible Roles 42.6
- 9 NASA CMR 41.8
- 10 Qentaz 41.1
- 1 Tabs 60.2
- 2 Postman 57.2
- 3 Paga 35.4
- 4 Brandfolder 35.1
- 5 Smithsonian Institution 32.5
- 6 Receeve 32.1
- 7 LooksRare 30.9
- 8 Moniepoint 30.8
- 9 Rarible 29.8
- 10 Veritus 29.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.