Collection
CollectionCollectionscollectioncollections
Providers using this tag (46)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 10 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 12 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (261)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 12 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 37 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 108 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 77 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (217)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Collection” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 217 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 46 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Collection, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 30.6 | 19.8 | +10.8 | 46 |
| Access Clarity | 33 | 26.3 | +6.7 | 46 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.1 | 13.9 | +4.2 | 46 |
| Discoverability | 64.8 | 61 | +3.8 | 46 |
| Contract Governance | 9 | 6.3 | +2.7 | 46 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 25.3 | 23.3 | +2 | 46 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 10% | +1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 9% | 0 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 0% | 11% | -11 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 4% | 2% | +2 |
| Governance rules | 24% | 14% | +10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Postman 72.5
- 2 Moniepoint 56.8
- 3 Brandfolder 55.8
- 4 Paga 54.7
- 5 Tabs 50.8
- 6 Rarible 47.8
- 7 Veritus 47.7
- 8 NASA CMR 43.7
- 9 Smithsonian Institution 43.7
- 10 Qentaz 42.9
- 1 Tabs 56.9
- 2 Postman 39.1
- 3 Brandfolder 36.4
- 4 Paga 35.4
- 5 Smithsonian Institution 32.5
- 6 Receeve 32.1
- 7 Veritus 31.8
- 8 Moniepoint 31.2
- 9 Rarible 29.8
- 10 Wallex 26.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.