Profiles
Profilesprofiles
Providers using this tag (124)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 11 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 23 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 50 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (122)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 12 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 24 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 48 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 30 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 124 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Profiles, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 55.9 | 17.5 | +38.4 | 124 |
| Operational Transparency | 35.4 | 11.3 | +24.1 | 124 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 39.7 | 17.9 | +21.8 | 124 |
| Access Clarity | 41.3 | 22.3 | +19 | 124 |
| Contract Governance | 19.8 | 6.4 | +13.4 | 124 |
| Discoverability | 73 | 60.4 | +12.6 | 124 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 36% | 16% | +20 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 7% | +12 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 48% | 9% | +39 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 53% | 13% | +40 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 RudderStack 80.2
- 2 Adobe Campaign 77.3
- 3 Klaviyo 76.9
- 4 Squarespace 75.8
- 5 Ada 75.7
- 6 Optimizely 75.1
- 7 Agorapulse 71.4
- 8 BlueConic 68.8
- 9 CleverTap 68.2
- 10 iOS 67.9
- 1 GC AI 58.8
- 2 Extole 57.2
- 3 Upsun 56.7
- 4 Newstore 56.3
- 5 Factset 52.8
- 6 RudderStack 52
- 7 mParticle 50.5
- 8 Agorapulse 50
- 9 Confluence 50
- 10 Dow Jones 48.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/profiles"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/profiles"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/profiles/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.