Library
Librarylibrary
Providers using this tag (178)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 52 Limited public surface area
Emerging 78 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (176)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 31 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 49 Limited public surface area
Emerging 86 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 178 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Library, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 32.4 | 17.5 | +14.9 | 178 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.5 | 11.3 | +14.2 | 178 |
| Access Clarity | 30.6 | 22.3 | +8.3 | 178 |
| Discoverability | 67.7 | 60.4 | +7.3 | 178 |
| Contract Governance | 9 | 6.4 | +2.6 | 178 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 16.9 | 17.9 | -1 | 178 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 6% | 16% | -10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 7% | -5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 9% | +10 |
| Security | 99% | 88% | +11 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 44% | 13% | +31 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Gong 66.4
- 2 Last.fm 63.7
- 3 Delft University of Technology 62.4
- 4 Fasten Health 59.2
- 5 University of Michigan-Ann Arbor 57.9
- 6 Plex 55.3
- 7 Microsoft Azure Active Directory 52.8
- 8 Azure Synapse Analytics 52.6
- 9 Cube 52.5
- 10 HR Partner 51.7
- 1 Plex 62.4
- 2 Hugging Face Transformers 53.9
- 3 VideoAmp 53.1
- 4 Gong 46.1
- 5 Fasten Health 38.5
- 6 Cube 36.4
- 7 Cube Planning 36.4
- 8 Columbia University 36
- 9 ETH Zurich – Swiss Federal Institute of Technology 35
- 10 Macquarie University 33.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/library"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/library"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/library/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.