Research Repository
Data RepositoryResearch Repository
Providers using this tag (147)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 2 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 50 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 71 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (156)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 49 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 75 Limited public surface area
Emerging 29 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (15)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Research Repository” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 147 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Research Repository, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 33.1 | 17.8 | +15.3 | 147 |
| Access Clarity | 41.6 | 26.5 | +15.1 | 147 |
| Operational Transparency | 22 | 13.8 | +8.2 | 147 |
| Discoverability | 65.6 | 58 | +7.6 | 147 |
| Contract Governance | 13.8 | 6.3 | +7.5 | 147 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.8 | 23.3 | +5.5 | 147 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 1% | 15% | -14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 2% | 13% | -11 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 36% | 12% | +24 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 0% | 2% | -2 |
| Governance rules | 47% | 13% | +34 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 University of Waterloo 60.4
- 2 Delft University of Technology 57.3
- 3 University of Warwick 52.6
- 4 University of Macau 51.3
- 5 Stanford University 50.3
- 6 University of Cambridge 50
- 7 University of Wisconsin-Madison 49.5
- 8 Dryad 49
- 9 University of Warsaw 48.6
- 10 University of Gothenburg 48.4
- 1 Columbia University 41.7
- 2 University of Melbourne 36.7
- 3 Queensland University of Technology 34.7
- 4 University of Amsterdam 33.5
- 5 University of New South Wales 33.3
- 6 Figshare 33.1
- 7 University of Chicago 33.1
- 8 University of Wisconsin-Madison 31.7
- 9 University of Waikato 31.3
- 10 Dryad 30.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.