Knowledge Base
Knowledge Baseknowledge-base
Providers using this tag (61)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 11 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 13 Limited public surface area
Emerging 10 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (26)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 5 Limited public surface area
Emerging 3 Early or largely undocumented
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 61 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Knowledge Base, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 43.9 | 17.5 | +26.4 | 61 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 38.4 | 17.9 | +20.5 | 61 |
| Access Clarity | 41.2 | 22.3 | +18.9 | 61 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.7 | 11.3 | +16.4 | 61 |
| Contract Governance | 15.8 | 6.4 | +9.4 | 61 |
| Discoverability | 69.6 | 60.4 | +9.2 | 61 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 39% | 16% | +23 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 25% | 7% | +18 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 34% | 9% | +25 |
| Security | 95% | 88% | +7 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 39% | 13% | +26 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Treasure Data 76.7
- 2 Infobip 71
- 3 GitLab 65.3
- 4 ServiceNow 64.8
- 5 Confluence 63.7
- 6 Erxes 62.2
- 7 AirOps 61.9
- 8 Synthflow 61.8
- 9 Zendesk 58.1
- 10 Gladly 57
- 1 Brainfish 58.8
- 2 Confluence 50
- 3 AirOps 48.7
- 4 Treasure Data 48.4
- 5 Telia Company 48.1
- 6 GitLab 47.8
- 7 Infobip 47.7
- 8 Atlassian 41.9
- 9 Synthflow 36.9
- 10 Vanilla Forums 36.7
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/knowledge-base"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/knowledge-base"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/knowledge-base/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.