Documentation
Documentationdocumentation
Providers using this tag (86)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 24 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 8 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (135)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 39 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 35 Limited public surface area
Emerging 26 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (96)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Documentation” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 96 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 79 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Documentation, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 37.4 | 19.8 | +17.6 | 79 |
| Operational Transparency | 23.4 | 14 | +9.4 | 79 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.2 | 23.4 | +8.8 | 79 |
| Access Clarity | 32.8 | 26.5 | +6.3 | 79 |
| Contract Governance | 12.6 | 6.4 | +6.2 | 79 |
| Discoverability | 64.4 | 61.2 | +3.2 | 79 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 14% | 10% | +4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 13% | +5 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 11% | 0 |
| Security | 98% | 97% | +1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 57% | 14% | +43 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Confluence 67.8
- 2 Hashnode 57.8
- 3 DeveloperHub 56.1
- 4 Treblle 55.8
- 5 CompanyCam 53.4
- 6 Speakeasy 53.3
- 7 Zeroheight 52.9
- 8 Apidog 52.5
- 9 Scribe 51.2
- 10 Elium 50.8
- 1 DeveloperHub 62.2
- 2 CoreStory 53
- 3 Confluence 51.6
- 4 Sweep 48.5
- 5 Slite 39.2
- 6 CompanyCam 37.5
- 7 Eraser 34.2
- 8 Zeroheight 32.9
- 9 Mintlify 32
- 10 APIMatic 31.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.