OpenAPI
Open APIOpenAPIOpenApiOpenapiopenapi
Providers using this tag (143)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 9 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 27 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 36 Limited public surface area
Emerging 31 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 2 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (194)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 17 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 28 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 52 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 47 Limited public surface area
Emerging 49 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (64)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “OpenAPI” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 64 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 140 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged OpenAPI, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 45.2 | 23.4 | +21.8 | 140 |
| Contract Quality | 39.8 | 19.8 | +20 | 140 |
| Operational Transparency | 33.6 | 14 | +19.6 | 140 |
| Access Clarity | 40.7 | 26.5 | +14.2 | 140 |
| Contract Governance | 16 | 6.4 | +9.6 | 140 |
| Discoverability | 69.7 | 61.2 | +8.5 | 140 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 34% | 10% | +24 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 35% | 13% | +22 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 19% | 11% | +8 |
| Security | 96% | 97% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 5% | 2% | +3 |
| Governance rules | 32% | 14% | +18 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 APIs.io 90
- 2 OpenMercantil 88.2
- 3 Zoho CRM 75.8
- 4 Redocly 74.6
- 5 0xArchive 72.7
- 6 Postman 72.5
- 7 Cvent Event Cloud 69.9
- 8 Stoplight 69.7
- 9 Tvarka ATK API 68.9
- 10 TranscriptFetch 64.7
- 1 APIs.io 75
- 2 Taskfolk 69.2
- 3 DeveloperHub 62.2
- 4 Archbee 60.6
- 5 StayingAPI 59.4
- 6 0xArchive 57.7
- 7 BTC War Live Market Data API 55
- 8 AirOps 51.7
- 9 anew 50.6
- 10 Conga 50.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.