OpenAPI
Providers using this tag (145)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 14 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 32 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 39 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 33 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 4 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (124)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 25 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 18 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 18 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 31 Limited public surface area
Emerging 29 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (52)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “OpenAPI” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 143 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged OpenAPI, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 48 | 23.2 | +24.8 | 143 |
| Contract Quality | 41 | 17.6 | +23.4 | 143 |
| Operational Transparency | 35.6 | 13.7 | +21.9 | 143 |
| Access Clarity | 44.3 | 26.5 | +17.8 | 143 |
| Contract Governance | 16.9 | 6.3 | +10.6 | 143 |
| Discoverability | 67.5 | 58.1 | +9.4 | 143 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 41% | 14% | +27 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 40% | 12% | +28 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 21% | 11% | +10 |
| Security | 97% | 98% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 31% | 14% | +17 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 APIs.io 90.1
- 2 Redocly 82.6
- 3 OpenMercantil 80.6
- 4 Postman 79.6
- 5 Zoho CRM 78.1
- 6 Cvent Event Cloud 71.9
- 7 Stoplight 71.8
- 8 Scalar 71.7
- 9 0xArchive 71.6
- 10 Archbee 70.9
- 1 APIs.io 75.3
- 2 Taskfolk 69.2
- 3 0xArchive 66.9
- 4 DeveloperHub 61.9
- 5 StayingAPI 59.4
- 6 Archbee 58.5
- 7 TranscriptFetch 58.1
- 8 Stotles 57.7
- 9 Scalar 57.6
- 10 Statable Stats API 57.6
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.