niche · -1.2 capabilitymarket schemadomain

Markdown

Score 19.8 / 100 47 providers +16 via APIs 22 APIs Search apis.io →
Business capabilities this tag reaches
AI Model Services 1

Providers using this tag (47)

Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.

Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 7 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 14 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 7 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented

APIs with this tag (21)

Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →

Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 4 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 3 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented

Companies reaching this through an API (16)

These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Markdown” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.

APIs.io Engineering Platform apitoolcalls-com Claix dataleads-pro FileToPDF.dev GitHub GitHub Enterprise GitLab GitLab CI/CD Influence payments-ai replynodes-com Roboto Scalar SourceHut VEIR

Score breakdown

Frequency
49.0
log-scaled weighted occurrences
Breadth
0.6
spread across providers
Quality lift
37.2
mean composite of providers using it
Cohesion
0.0
strength of nearest seed neighbor

Related tags

HTML 6 co-occurrences Extract 5 co-occurrences Web Scraping 9 co-occurrences PDF 9 co-occurrences Screenshots 6 co-occurrences Data Extraction 8 co-occurrences Version Control 6 co-occurrences

Where this tag comes from

Provider tag47
Api tag20
Openapi tag13
Openapi op tag39

Cohort brief

Auto-generated

The 46 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Markdown, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.

Providers
46
of 47 in the catalog
Mean Kin Score
37.1
+13.0 vs catalog 24.1
Mean Agent Readiness
28
+13.9 vs catalog 14.1
Spread
11–74.3
median 37.1 · σ 16.9
How the 46 split by band
Exemplar 2Strong 7Developing 13Thin 7Emerging 17Minimal 0
Facet averages, against the whole catalog
FacetThis cohortCatalogDifferenceScored
Contract Quality 36.9 18.6 +18.3 46
Developer Ergonomics 39.8 24.5 +15.3 46
Access Clarity 40.6 30 +10.6 46
Contract Governance 18.7 9.7 +9 46
Operational Transparency 22.1 13.2 +8.9 46
Discoverability 64.8 59.1 +5.7 46

A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.

What this cohort publishes
ArtifactThis cohortCatalogDifference
MCP server (any) 30% 18% +12
MCP server (first-party) 28% 16% +12
Agent Skills 0% 0% 0
OAuth scopes 17% 13% +4
Security 96% 99% -3
Arazzo workflows 0% 1% -1
Governance rules 78% 36% +42

mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.

Top by Kin Score
  1. 1 SerpApi 74.3
  2. 2 Buttondown 70
  3. 3 WebCrawlerAPI 65.8
  4. 4 String 61
  5. 5 HackMD 60.4
  6. 6 Contrie 58.8
  7. 7 Commentary 58.5
  8. 8 Comment.io 56.5
  9. 9 Onto 54.9
  10. 10 hydrafetch-com 53.9
Top by Agent Readiness
  1. 1 hydrafetch-com 63.1
  2. 2 String 60.7
  3. 3 Contrie 58.8
  4. 4 Keep 55.6
  5. 5 Commentary 55.1
  6. 6 Comment.io 55.1
  7. 7 spoken-md 51.1
  8. 8 Onto 45.1
  9. 9 Spider 44.2
  10. 10 Artifact Share 43.7
All 47 members of this roster resolve to a provider in the catalog; 46 carry a score (98%). The figures above describe the scored members only.
Coverage caveat. 25 of 46 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 14 November 2026, across 41591 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.

Work with this as data

Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.

MCP server

One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.

https://apis.io/mcp

Tools for tags

7 MCP tools reach this
  • find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.
  • get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.
  • cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.
  • cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.
  • apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.
  • resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.
  • find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
All 92 tools →

Call it yourself

curl for this page
This tag
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/markdown"
All tags
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
As a scored cohort (paid plan)
The distribution (Pro)

Calls without X-API-Key need no key. Calls with it need a paid plan — get a key.

Get an API key

Free tier, no form to fill in. Signing in shares your email address with us — we store it to create your key and to recognise you if you sign in with another provider. See our Privacy Policy and Terms.

A second provider on the same verified email joins the account you already have.