Forms
Formsforms
Providers using this tag (46)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (120)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 13 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 19 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 39 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 31 Limited public surface area
Emerging 17 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (86)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Forms” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 86 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 46 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Forms, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 48.8 | 19.8 | +29 | 46 |
| Access Clarity | 54.1 | 26.5 | +27.6 | 46 |
| Operational Transparency | 36.2 | 14 | +22.2 | 46 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 40.5 | 23.4 | +17.1 | 46 |
| Discoverability | 69.9 | 61.2 | +8.7 | 46 |
| Contract Governance | 10.6 | 6.4 | +4.2 | 46 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 10% | +10 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 33% | 13% | +20 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 30% | 11% | +19 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 41% | 14% | +27 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Kit 82.8
- 2 GetResponse 74.3
- 3 Paubox 71.5
- 4 Omnisend 70.2
- 5 Healthie 68.2
- 6 Connecteam 59.8
- 7 Wufoo 58.6
- 8 Pabbly 57.5
- 9 Fieldwire 57.3
- 10 Formboost 56.4
- 1 Paubox 61.5
- 2 Kit 60.4
- 3 Omnisend 57.3
- 4 Lone Wolf Technologies 49.3
- 5 GetResponse 47.8
- 6 Connecteam 43.3
- 7 FormAssembly 39.2
- 8 Google Forms 35.1
- 9 SurveyMonkey 34.5
- 10 Tally 34.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.