Forms
Providers using this tag (48)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Developing 16 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 1 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (110)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 16 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 22 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 36 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 26 Limited public surface area
Emerging 9 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (76)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Forms” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 76 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 48 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Forms, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 45.8 | 17.6 | +28.2 | 48 |
| Access Clarity | 53.4 | 26.5 | +26.9 | 48 |
| Operational Transparency | 36.1 | 13.7 | +22.4 | 48 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 41.7 | 23.2 | +18.5 | 48 |
| Discoverability | 68.3 | 58.1 | +10.2 | 48 |
| Contract Governance | 10.6 | 6.3 | +4.3 | 48 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 33% | 14% | +19 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 33% | 12% | +21 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 31% | 11% | +20 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 42% | 14% | +28 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Kit 78.5
- 2 Omnisend 72.9
- 3 GetResponse 71.6
- 4 Paubox 68.4
- 5 Emboss 66
- 6 Healthie 65.8
- 7 Connecteam 62.3
- 8 Formboost 57.6
- 9 Fieldwire 56.2
- 10 Digioh 56
- 1 Emboss 63.7
- 2 Paubox 61.5
- 3 Kit 60.4
- 4 Omnisend 57.3
- 5 FormAssembly 50.4
- 6 Lone Wolf Technologies 49.3
- 7 Tally 48.3
- 8 GetResponse 47.8
- 9 Tallyfy 47.8
- 10 involve.me 47.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.