Coatue Management
Coatue Management is a global technology-focused investment manager founded in 1999 by Philippe Laffont, headquartered in New York City with offices in Menlo Park, San Francisco, London, and Hong Kong. Originally launched as a technology hedge fund, Coatue now invests across public and private markets through venture, growth, tactical (structured debt and equity), and public equities strategies, emphasizing data-driven research and responsible risk management. The firm backs disruptive, high-growth technology companies with a strong current thesis around artificial intelligence, software, cloud and data infrastructure, fintech, and frontier/space, writing checks that range from early-stage venture ($500K–$10M) through large growth and public-market allocations. Coatue managed roughly $54–55B in assets as of end of 2024 and counts Anthropic, OpenAI, Databricks, Stripe, SpaceX, Figma, and Cursor among its private portfolio companies.
Coatue Management has 373 portfolio companies tracked on the APIs.io network, of which 200 (54%) publish APIs indexed here. The remaining 154 are tracked as profiles without a published API on the network.
Its highest-rated API providers on the network are Anthropic, Confluent, Plaid, Postman, OpenAI.
Portfolio on the Network
Portfolio companies that publish APIs indexed on APIs.io, grouped by their API Evangelist rating. Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 29 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 25 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 42 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 64 Limited public surface area
Emerging 31 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 9 Almost no public developer surface
Rest of Portfolio
19 further portfolio companies that don’t yet have a provider page on the network.
Scroll for all 19
Properties
Firm
The firm itself
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 279 portfolio companies with APIs in the catalog, backed by Coatue Management, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Transparency | 23.4 | 13.2 | +10.2 | 279 |
| Contract Quality | 27.8 | 17.7 | +10.1 | 279 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 32.9 | 23.8 | +9.1 | 279 |
| Access Clarity | 35 | 26.5 | +8.5 | 279 |
| Discoverability | 62.3 | 58 | +4.3 | 279 |
| Contract Governance | 9.4 | 7 | +2.4 | 279 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 29% | 15% | +14 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 28% | 13% | +15 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 12% | +6 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 8% | 2% | +6 |
| Governance rules | 28% | 18% | +10 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Lightfield {"score" => 67.4, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 2 Canva {"score" => 65.3, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 3 Sumble {"score" => 62.3, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 4 Databricks {"score" => 58.9, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 5 Meld.io {"score" => 58.8, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 6 Stripe {"score" => 58.5, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 7 OpenAI {"score" => 58.4, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 8 ClickHouse {"score" => 58.4, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 9 OneTrust {"score" => 58.3, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 10 Figma {"score" => 57.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
Coverage caveat. 215 of 279 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 2 November 2026, across 37080 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Source (apis.yml)
Work with this as data
Every firm here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.