Social Media
Providers using this tag (154)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 8 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 24 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 23 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 18 Limited public surface area
Emerging 24 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 56 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (34)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 7 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 9 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 8 Limited public surface area
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Social Media” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
154 providers carry this tag directly, and 169 counting the 2 narrower tags below — 15 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 127 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Social Media, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 44.7 | 26.5 | +18.2 | 127 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.2 | 13.7 | +11.5 | 127 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 34 | 23.2 | +10.8 | 127 |
| Contract Quality | 22.7 | 17.6 | +5.1 | 127 |
| Contract Governance | 9.6 | 6.3 | +3.3 | 127 |
| Discoverability | 60.7 | 58.1 | +2.6 | 127 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 31% | 14% | +17 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 32% | 12% | +20 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 34% | 11% | +23 |
| Security | 98% | 98% | 0 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 16% | 14% | +2 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 LinkedIn 75.7
- 2 X 70.9
- 3 Agorapulse 69.5
- 4 Facebook Business Manager 68
- 5 DataForSEO 67.2
- 6 Snapchat 67.2
- 7 Buffer 67
- 8 Instagram 66.8
- 9 Postiz 66.4
- 10 KonbiniAPI 65.1
- 1 AnyAPI 70.8
- 2 Publora 69.6
- 3 X 61.8
- 4 Synup 60.5
- 5 DataForSEO 60.4
- 6 OpusClip 57.5
- 7 TikTok Marketing API 56.9
- 8 Social Fetch 56.2
- 9 KonbiniAPI 56.1
- 10 Agorapulse 55.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.