gRPC
Providers using this tag (89)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 26 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 32 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (150)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 53 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 58 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (69)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “gRPC” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 69 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 89 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged gRPC, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 51.2 | 23.2 | +28 | 89 |
| Operational Transparency | 27.5 | 13.7 | +13.8 | 89 |
| Contract Quality | 31.3 | 17.6 | +13.7 | 89 |
| Discoverability | 65.6 | 58.1 | +7.5 | 89 |
| Contract Governance | 8 | 6.3 | +1.7 | 89 |
| Access Clarity | 28.2 | 26.5 | +1.7 | 89 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 20% | 14% | +6 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 18% | 12% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 11% | -1 |
| Security | 96% | 98% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Postman 79.6
- 2 Heroic Labs 66.3
- 3 Buf 65.3
- 4 Gravitee 65.2
- 5 Stack Moxie 64.5
- 6 Viam 60.2
- 7 Aptos 57.8
- 8 Actionpower 57.3
- 9 Sift Stack 56.9
- 10 Nord Security 56.4
- 1 Postman 54.9
- 2 Buf 49.2
- 3 Mysten Labs 48.6
- 4 Nord Security 43.5
- 5 Kurrent 43.4
- 6 Polar Signals 41.2
- 7 OpenX 40.5
- 8 AGNTCY 39.2
- 9 Tailor 38.3
- 10 Sift Stack 37.2
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.