gRPC
gRPCgrpc
Providers using this tag (91)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 27 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 35 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
APIs with this tag (150)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 6 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 48 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 59 Limited public surface area
Emerging 25 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 2 Not yet scored
Companies reaching this through an API (72)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “gRPC” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 72 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 89 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged gRPC, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 52.1 | 23.4 | +28.7 | 89 |
| Contract Quality | 34.2 | 19.8 | +14.4 | 89 |
| Operational Transparency | 28.1 | 14 | +14.1 | 89 |
| Discoverability | 70.3 | 61.2 | +9.1 | 89 |
| Access Clarity | 29 | 26.5 | +2.5 | 89 |
| Contract Governance | 8.3 | 6.4 | +1.9 | 89 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 10% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 13% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 10% | 11% | -1 |
| Security | 96% | 97% | -1 |
| Arazzo workflows | 2% | 2% | 0 |
| Governance rules | 15% | 14% | +1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Postman 72.5
- 2 Heroic Labs 67.9
- 3 Stack Moxie 62.4
- 4 Buf 61
- 5 Sift Stack 60.6
- 6 Viam 60.2
- 7 Aptos 58.8
- 8 Gravitee 56.8
- 9 Engine 55.6
- 10 Nord Security 54.7
- 1 Buf 51.7
- 2 Kurrent 45.5
- 3 Postman 44.2
- 4 Nord Security 43.5
- 5 OpenX 40.5
- 6 Sift Stack 39.7
- 7 AGNTCY 39.2
- 8 AgiBot 37.9
- 9 Polar Signals 37.6
- 10 Actionpower 35.8
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.