Tracking
Providers using this tag (54)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 6 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 22 Limited public surface area
Emerging 4 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 11 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (135)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 14 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 9 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 37 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 38 Limited public surface area
Emerging 22 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 15 Almost no public developer surface
Companies reaching this through an API (86)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Tracking” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 86 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 52 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Tracking, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 38.5 | 17.6 | +20.9 | 52 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 36.1 | 23.2 | +12.9 | 52 |
| Discoverability | 66.2 | 58.1 | +8.1 | 52 |
| Access Clarity | 34 | 26.5 | +7.5 | 52 |
| Operational Transparency | 20.6 | 13.7 | +6.9 | 52 |
| Contract Governance | 9.3 | 6.3 | +3 | 52 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 13% | 14% | -1 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 13% | 12% | +1 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 13% | 11% | +2 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 10% | 2% | +8 |
| Governance rules | 29% | 14% | +15 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 AfterShip 78.6
- 2 Impact 71.4
- 3 Sendcloud 67.5
- 4 Google Tag Manager 65.1
- 5 parcelLab 63
- 6 Onfleet 60.7
- 7 Partnerize 59.7
- 8 HyperTrack 59.3
- 9 Metrilo 56.2
- 10 Shippo 50.1
- 1 AfterShip 59.6
- 2 Impact 56.4
- 3 Boxc 50.1
- 4 Onfleet 48.7
- 5 Sendcloud 47.7
- 6 Ninja Van 46.3
- 7 Skydropx 46.3
- 8 HyperTrack 42.6
- 9 Ship24 38.1
- 10 Google Tag Manager 36.9
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.