Fraud Detection
Providers using this tag (90)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Strong 8 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 20 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 26 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 4 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (17)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 4 Limited public surface area
Emerging 7 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (5)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Fraud Detection” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 81 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Fraud Detection, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Clarity | 34.1 | 26.5 | +7.6 | 81 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 28.9 | 23.4 | +5.5 | 81 |
| Operational Transparency | 18.6 | 14 | +4.6 | 81 |
| Contract Quality | 24.2 | 19.8 | +4.4 | 81 |
| Discoverability | 64 | 61.2 | +2.8 | 81 |
| Contract Governance | 8.3 | 6.4 | +1.9 | 81 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 7% | 10% | -3 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 9% | 13% | -4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 8% | 11% | -3 |
| Security | 95% | 97% | -2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 1% | 2% | -1 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 iDenfy 66.2
- 2 Strivacity 65.7
- 3 Kita 64.8
- 4 ShieldLabs 64.2
- 5 Mastercard 58.2
- 6 Ocrolus 57.7
- 7 Findigs 56.4
- 8 Amazon Fraud Detector 55.5
- 9 Clearspeed 53.8
- 10 Snappt 53
- 1 Clearspeed 58.1
- 2 Resistant AI 45.9
- 3 ShieldLabs 42.1
- 4 iDenfy 41.5
- 5 Kita 39.6
- 6 Mastercard 38.8
- 7 Ocrolus 38.7
- 8 Primer 36.3
- 9 ComplyAdvantage 36.2
- 10 Strivacity 34.4
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.