Plugins
Plug-InsPlug-insPluginsplugins
Providers using this tag (123)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 27 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 44 Limited public surface area
Emerging 29 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (114)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 5 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 15 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 43 Limited public surface area
Emerging 23 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 3 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 123 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Plugins, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Quality | 41.5 | 17.5 | +24 | 123 |
| Developer Ergonomics | 35.7 | 17.9 | +17.8 | 123 |
| Operational Transparency | 25.4 | 11.3 | +14.1 | 123 |
| Access Clarity | 33.2 | 22.3 | +10.9 | 123 |
| Discoverability | 69.2 | 60.4 | +8.8 | 123 |
| Contract Governance | 14.7 | 6.4 | +8.3 | 123 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 25% | 16% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 14% | 7% | +7 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 18% | 9% | +9 |
| Security | 98% | 88% | +10 |
| Arazzo workflows | 13% | 2% | +11 |
| Governance rules | 50% | 13% | +37 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Twilio 73.4
- 2 Canvas Medical 70.1
- 3 BlueConic 68.8
- 4 Matomo 67.3
- 5 Microsoft Outlook 66.5
- 6 Yoast 64.7
- 7 Figma 63.8
- 8 Palo Alto Networks 63.7
- 9 Bubble 63.6
- 10 Arcade 60.8
- 1 Duvo Ai 63.1
- 2 Automattic 62.3
- 3 duvo.ai 60.4
- 4 Figma 53.2
- 5 Openwork 52.6
- 6 BlueConic 47
- 7 Harbinger Health 46.9
- 8 Starfish Space 46.9
- 9 Microsoft Outlook 46
- 10 Webflow 45.5
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.
MCP server
One button, every client — Claude, Cursor, VS Code and the rest.
https://apis.io/mcp
Tools for tags
7 MCP tools reach this
find_tagsBrowse and filter every tag in the catalog.get_cohortThis tag as a scored cohort — every provider carrying it, with scores.cohort_statsPRO — the distribution across this tag: mean, median, band split, adoption rates.cohort_rankingsPRO — the leaderboard, on composite AND agent-readiness axes.apis_io_searchSTART HERE — APIs, providers and tags for one query, each with its total.resolveTurn a domain, URL or GitHub org into the provider it belongs to.find_cohortsEvery scored population of providers in the catalog.
Call it yourself
curl for this page
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags/plugins"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/tags?limit=25"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/plugins"
curl "https://apis.io/api/v1/cohorts/tag/plugins/stats" \
-H "X-API-Key: $APIS_IO_KEY"
Discovery needs no key. Ratings and market analysis are Pro.