Risk
Riskrisk
Providers using this tag (86)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 10 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 17 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 16 Limited public surface area
Emerging 21 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 20 Almost no public developer surface
Unrated 1 Not yet scored
APIs with this tag (91)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 4 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 17 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 25 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 25 Limited public surface area
Emerging 20 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (54)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Risk” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Show all 54 companies ↓
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 80 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Risk, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 33.4 | 23.4 | +10 | 80 |
| Access Clarity | 33.6 | 26.5 | +7.1 | 80 |
| Contract Quality | 26.5 | 19.8 | +6.7 | 80 |
| Operational Transparency | 19.1 | 14 | +5.1 | 80 |
| Discoverability | 65.6 | 61.2 | +4.4 | 80 |
| Contract Governance | 7.7 | 6.4 | +1.3 | 80 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 12% | 10% | +2 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 17% | 13% | +4 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 14% | 11% | +3 |
| Security | 99% | 97% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 7% | 2% | +5 |
| Governance rules | 9% | 14% | -5 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 AlphaLoops FMCSA Carrier Data API 68.2
- 2 Tomorrow.io 65.1
- 3 Dun & Bradstreet 64
- 4 anecdotes 63.1
- 5 First Street 59.1
- 6 Fraud.net 58.5
- 7 Fenergo 57.2
- 8 Secureframe 56.3
- 9 MetaMap 56.2
- 10 Justt 56.1
- 1 Justt 51.5
- 2 Mireye 47.8
- 3 Fenergo 44.8
- 4 Dun & Bradstreet 44.5
- 5 Secureframe 43.9
- 6 Sex Offenders API 40.5
- 7 Moody's 38.2
- 8 anecdotes 36.7
- 9 AlphaLoops FMCSA Carrier Data API 35.4
- 10 First Street 35.1
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.