Fraud
Providers using this tag (33)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Exemplar 2 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 3 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 8 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 9 Limited public surface area
Emerging 6 Early or largely undocumented
Minimal 5 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (35)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Exemplar 1 Complete, well-documented, and agent-ready
Strong 5 Solid coverage with minor gaps
Developing 3 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Emerging 15 Early or largely undocumented
Companies reaching this through an API (18)
These companies publish an API, specification or operation carrying “Fraud” but do not classify their business under it. Listed unranked and kept out of the count above, because one tagged operation is not a statement about what a company does.
Score breakdown
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 32 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged Fraud, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 39 | 23.4 | +15.6 | 32 |
| Contract Quality | 31.9 | 19.8 | +12.1 | 32 |
| Operational Transparency | 22.7 | 14 | +8.7 | 32 |
| Discoverability | 68.2 | 61.2 | +7 | 32 |
| Access Clarity | 30.4 | 26.5 | +3.9 | 32 |
| Contract Governance | 10.2 | 6.4 | +3.8 | 32 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 19% | 10% | +9 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 19% | 13% | +6 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 16% | 11% | +5 |
| Security | 100% | 97% | +3 |
| Arazzo workflows | 3% | 2% | +1 |
| Governance rules | 13% | 14% | -1 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Bolt Financial 70.1
- 2 AlphaLoops FMCSA Carrier Data API 68.2
- 3 Fraud.net 58.5
- 4 Justt 56.1
- 5 ProcessOut 55.7
- 6 Payrails 52.7
- 7 ACI Worldwide 49.3
- 8 Discover 48.7
- 9 TRM Labs 47.3
- 10 Jack Henry & Associates 45.7
- 1 Bolt Financial 52.4
- 2 Justt 51.5
- 3 ProcessOut 44.6
- 4 Discover 37.8
- 5 Tribe Payments 35.7
- 6 AlphaLoops FMCSA Carrier Data API 35.4
- 7 Cequence Security 33.6
- 8 FrankieOne 30.6
- 9 TransUnion 29.7
- 10 Fraud.net 29.3
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.