MENA
Providers using this tag (75)
Ranked by API Evangelist rating — Exemplar and Strong are expanded by default.
Developing 11 Usable, with meaningful gaps to close
Thin 11 Limited public surface area
Minimal 32 Almost no public developer surface
APIs with this tag (1)
Ranked by the provider's API Evangelist rating — the Kin Score is scored per provider, not per API, so every API of a provider shares its band. How the rating works →
Minimal 1 Almost no public developer surface
Score breakdown
Where this tag sits
75 providers carry this tag directly, and 292 counting the 17 narrower tags below — 217 more to reach.
Related tags
Where this tag comes from
Markets provisional
Kin Score markets whose measured providers carry this tag. Share is the fraction of the market's measured providers that carry it — it describes the market, not this tag.
| Market | Share of the market's providers |
|---|---|
| Southeast Asia and National Fintech Registers (Taiwan, UAE, Malaysia remittance, Indonesia SNAP) | 23% |
| Gulf and Southeast Asia Open Finance | 22% |
Cohort brief
Auto-generatedThe 71 providers in the APIs.io catalog tagged MENA, scored on the Kin Score. Every figure below is computed from the catalog — nothing here is written.
| Facet | This cohort | Catalog | Difference | Scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer Ergonomics | 30.4 | 23.8 | +6.6 | 71 |
| Contract Quality | 22.5 | 17.7 | +4.8 | 71 |
| Discoverability | 61.2 | 58 | +3.2 | 71 |
| Access Clarity | 26.4 | 26.5 | -0.1 | 71 |
| Contract Governance | 6.2 | 7 | -0.8 | 71 |
| Operational Transparency | 10.7 | 13.2 | -2.5 | 71 |
A facet is averaged over the members that carry it, not over the whole cohort — the “Scored” column is that count. Averaging an absent facet as zero would score our own coverage gaps as the providers’ posture.
| Artifact | This cohort | Catalog | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP server (any) | 11% | 15% | -4 |
| MCP server (first-party) | 11% | 13% | -2 |
| Agent Skills | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| OAuth scopes | 11% | 12% | -1 |
| Security | 100% | 98% | +2 |
| Arazzo workflows | 6% | 2% | +4 |
| Governance rules | 7% | 18% | -11 |
mcp_pct counts any mcp/ artifact including ones API Evangelist derived from the provider OpenAPI; mcp_first_party_pct counts only servers the provider publishes. Prefer the latter.
- 1 Sarj AI Developer API {"score" => 65.6, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 2 Lean Technologies {"score" => 53, "band" => "agent-native"}
- 3 Salla {"score" => 52.3, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 4 Paymob {"score" => 46.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 5 Ziina {"score" => 43.7, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 6 Tabby {"score" => 41.9, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 7 Zest Equity {"score" => 37.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 8 Zest {"score" => 37.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 9 PointCheckout {"score" => 36.8, "band" => "agent-ready"}
- 10 Mamo {"score" => 34.9, "band" => "agent-ready"}
Coverage caveat. 65 of 71 scored members had under half their catalog-attributable points satisfied at all (catalog_earned / catalog_max < 0.5). They are INCLUDED in the mean above. A large share here means the cohort mean is partly a measurement of how far our enrichment reached, not only of how these providers publish.Generated from the catalog build of 2 November 2026, across 37080 providers, using the same computation served by the APIs.io cohort API. Briefs are published for rosters of 5 or more scored providers; below that a distribution is not meaningful.
Work with this as data
Every tag here is available over the APIs.io API and to AI agents over MCP.